Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G vs Google Pixel 8a

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G (with MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra) that was released on September 21, 2023, against the Google Pixel 8a, which is powered by Google Tensor G3 and came out 7 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 18W)
  • Has a 0.57 inch larger screen size
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Thinner bezels – 8.4% more screen real estate
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 8a
  • 43% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1433K versus 1003K)
  • Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 7.5W
  • Delivers 18% higher peak brightness (1506 against 1276 nits)
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+1)
  • 27% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1491 and 1174 points
  • Weighs 16.5 grams less
  • The phone is 7 months newer
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G and Google Pixel 8a crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
5.7
(Bad)
Value Index
66.7
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.1 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2712 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 446 ppi 430 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 1400 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Screen-to-body ratio 89.7% 81.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 96.4% 99.1%
PWM 120 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 1 ms 2 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
6.67″ (20:9 ratio) = 16.6 in2
Pixel 8a
6.1″ (20:9 ratio) = 13.9 in2
~19% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Pixel 8a +18%
1506 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 161.4 mm (6.35 inches) 152.1 mm (5.99 inches)
Width 74.2 mm (2.92 inches) 72.7 mm (2.86 inches)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) 8.9 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight 204.5 g (7.21 oz) 188 g (6.63 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP67
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors White, Black, Green, Purple White, Black, Blue, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.52/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G and Google Pixel 8a
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra Google Tensor G3
Max clock 2800 MHz 3000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 9 (1 + 4 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 4 cores at 1.7 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 4 cores at 2.37 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 2.91 GHz: Cortex-X3
L3 cache 4 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 650 Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G610 MC4 Immortalis-G715s MC10
GPU shading units 256 896
GPU clock 1130 MHz 890 MHz
FLOPS ~578.6 GFLOPS ~1594.8 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G and Google Pixel 8a
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 3654 8490
Single-core score 1174 1491
Multi-core score 2610 3584
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Pixel 8a +43%
1433693
CPU 382694 546093
GPU 164972 391230
Memory 177265 195569
UX 278147 300801
Total score 1003078 1433693
Samples [39 tests] [6 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 98% 67%
Graphics test 3 FPS 7 FPS
Graphics score 463 990
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 7 FPS -
Graphics score 1179 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-12 (Servi Tuli)AnTuTu 121040269
📘 2026-10-04 (MineUS)AnTuTu 111023280
📘 2026-08-21 (0rin)AnTuTu 111009666
📘 2026-07-24 (Toriq albar)AnTuTu 111041446
📘 2026-07-19 (Oleg)AnTuTu 111039401
Google Pixel 8a
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-12-28 (adismsha)AnTuTu 111471866
📘 2025-12-22 -> jpara_diseGeekbench 6 GPU8490
📘 2025-12-22 -> jpara_diseGeekbench 6 CPU1491 / 3584
📘 2025-12-22 -> jpara_diseAnTuTu 111397797
📘 2025-12-17 (jpara_dise)AnTuTu 111397797

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory clock 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 17)
ROM HyperOS 3 Stock Android
OS size 39 GB 18.4 GB
OS updates 2 years 7 years
Security updates 2 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 4492 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 18 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (7.5 W)
Reverse charging No No
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes (67% in 15 min) Yes (33% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:25 hr 2:09 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 07:52 hr 08:15 hr
Watching video 11:32 hr 13:00 hr
Gaming 05:27 hr 04:54 hr
Standby 89 hr 86 hr
General battery life
Pixel 8a +3%
19:43 hr

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 64 megapixels
Image resolution 16384 x 12288 9000 x 7000
Zoom Digital (lossless), 4x Digital
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 64 MP
2) Ultrawide: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 64 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP3 Sony IMX787
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.73" (≈ 0.58 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 16 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX355 Sony IMX712
Sensor size 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Sensor Omnivision OV02B10 -
Sensor size 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.75 micron -
Stabilization Digital -

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 60 60
Preview 64 71
Zoom 109 126
Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G from DxOMark Photo samples of Google Pixel 8a from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 4032 x 3024
Aperture f/2.6 -
Sensor Omnivision OV16A1Q -
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) -
Pixel size 1 micron -
Autofocus No -
Stabilization Digital -
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
Pixel 8a +1%
89.3 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced September 2023 May 2024
Release date January 2024 May 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $449 $499
Successor - Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G - Google Pixel 10a
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 120 W Not included
Further details
Notes on Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G:
    - The eco-leather version is 5.5 grams lighter than the regular one.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Google Pixel 8a is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
9 (33.3%)
18 (66.7%)
Total votes: 27

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Eyal August 18, 2024 at 04:28 PM
Take consider that xiaomi is also cheaper. I think Xiaomi is a a winner in this case.
+4 Reply