Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G vs Honor X9d
58
out of 100
VS
70
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G (with MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra) that was released on January 10, 2025, against the Honor X9d, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 and came out 8 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Honor X9d
- Comes with 2800 mAh larger battery capacity: 8300 vs 5500 mAh
- 75% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (977K versus 558K)
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Supports higher wattage charging (66W versus 45W)
- Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.79 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1200 x 2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.85:9 |
| PPI | 395 ppi | 427 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 6000 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 480 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.4% | 90.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.7% | - |
| PWM | 120 Hz | - |
| Response time | 2 ms | - |
| Contrast | β Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.16 mm (6.38 inches) | 161.9 mm (6.37 inches) |
| Width | 74.92 mm (2.95 inches) | 76.1 mm (3 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) | 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP64 | IP69 |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Purple | Black, Gold, Green, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Average (2.61/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 180 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) - 3 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 1 core at 2.3 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~588.8 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1302 | 3987 |
| Single-core score | 718 | 1104 |
| Multi-core score | 1934 | 3159 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 198570 | 358049 |
| GPU | 43521 | 160718 |
| Memory | 148613 | 210830 |
| UX | 167499 | 247707 |
| Total score | 558203 | 977304 |
| Samples | [9 tests] | [21 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 97% | - |
| Graphics test | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |
| Graphics score | 132 | 350 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11476 | 10627 |
| Video editing | 5896 | 6303 |
| Photo editing | 19057 | 19133 |
| Data manipulation | 8303 | 7981 |
| Writing score | 11781 | 13750 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-26 -> its_bhhb.44 | AnTuTu 11 | 562129 |
| π 2026-09-26 -> its_bhhb.44 | AnTuTu 12 | 661409 |
| π 2026-08-31 -> cott122 | AnTuTu 11 | 588540 |
| π 2026-07-10 (zxwytri) | AnTuTu 11 | 563226 |
| π 2026-05-08 (ΠΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ228) | AnTuTu 11 | 527118 |
Honor X9d
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-10-01 (KIR4K) | AnTuTu 12 | 941587 |
| π 2026-09-04 (BatheanThe_) | AnTuTu 11 | 912468 |
| π 2026-08-29 (Kk) | AnTuTu 11 | 866729 |
| π 2026-07-21 (Raf Hakobyan) | AnTuTu 11 | 973945 |
| π 2026-07-21 (Raf Hakobyan) | CPU Throttle | 100% |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | MagicOS 9.0 |
| OS size | 27 GB | - |
| OS updates | 2 years | 2 years |
| Security updates | 2 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5500 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 66 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (42% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:21 hr | 1:21 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 08:52 hr | - |
| Watching video | 12:15 hr | - |
| Gaming | 05:20 hr | - |
| Standby | 126 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 108 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12240 | 12000 x 9000 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Angle of widest lens | 120Β° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 108 MP 2) Ultrawide: 5 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHP3 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (β 0.71 inch) | 1/1.67" (β 0.6 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A8 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 2 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | - |
| Sensor | SmartSens SC202CS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/5.1" (β 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.75 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 3456 x 4608 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV32D40 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0" (β 0.33 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | Yes | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | January 2025 | September 2025 |
| Release date | January 2025 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $350 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | - |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 66 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor X9d is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 46