Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Google Pixel 9a

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on April 24, 2025, against the Google Pixel 9a, which is powered by Google Tensor G4 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
  • Comes with 2450 mAh larger battery capacity: 7550 vs 5100 mAh
  • Has a 0.53 inch larger screen size
  • 74% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2292K versus 1321K)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 23W)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Thinner bezels – 5.6% more screen real estate
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 9a
  • Handles wireless charging up to 7.5W
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • Weighs 33 grams less
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro and Google Pixel 9a crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
104.9
(Excellent)
Value Index
62.3
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED POLED
Size 6.83 inches 6.3 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2772 pixels 1080 x 2424 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 447 ppi 422 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 2700 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 1800 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1% 84.5%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space - 98.2%
PWM - 240 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
6.83″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.7 in2
Pixel 9a
6.3″ (20:9 ratio) = 14.9 in2
~19% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1927 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.1 mm (6.42 inches) 154.7 mm (6.09 inches)
Width 77.93 mm (3.07 inches) 73.3 mm (2.89 inches)
Thickness 7.98 mm (0.31 inches) 8.9 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 186 g (6.56 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green White, Black, Red, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.53/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
90.1%
84.5%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro and Google Pixel 9a
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Google Tensor G4
Max clock 3210 MHz 3100 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 4 cores at 1.92 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.1 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 825 Mali-G715 MP7
GPU shading units 1024 896
GPU clock 1150 MHz 940 MHz
FLOPS ~2355.2 GFLOPS ~1684.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro and Google Pixel 9a
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2002
1677
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
7029
4067
Compute Score (GPU)
18498
7784
Compute Score (GPU) 18498 7784
Single-core score 2002 1677
Multi-core score 7029 4067
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2292541
1321069
CPU 660045 445318
GPU 807212 410687
Memory 351865 175537
UX 473419 289527
Total score 2292541 1321069
Samples [84 tests] [7 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1688
1060
Stability 82% 81%
Graphics test 13 FPS 8 FPS
Graphics score 1688 1060
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 29 FPS -
Section 1 33 FPS -
Section 2 29 FPS -
Section 3 24 FPS -
Graphics score 7542 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 22 FPS -
Graphics score 3705 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
16070
12890
Web score 15610 10570
Video editing 7765 7547
Photo editing 30492 21264
Data manipulation 14151 12988
Writing score 18243 16308

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-13 (Mimi)AnTuTu 122561461
📘 2026-09-27 (Mattzuuu)AnTuTu 122550072
📘 2026-09-22 (Xiaomi Redmi turbo 4 pro)AnTuTu 122599873
📘 2026-09-18 -> JepbismudAnTuTu 122451211
📘 2026-09-17 (Siyam Rahman)AnTuTu 122509031
Google Pixel 9a
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-21 (Leif)AnTuTu 111590049
📘 2026-05-13 (kiriguap)AnTuTu 111182042
📘 2026-03-09 (d1ldo)AnTuTu 11943849
📘 2026-01-03 (Joy)AnTuTu 111487240
📘 2025-11-11 (VLAD)AnTuTu 111507185

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4800 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 17)
ROM HyperOS 3.0 Stock Android
OS size - 14 GB
OS updates - 7 years
Security updates - 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7550 mAh 5100 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 23 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (7.5 W)
Reverse charging Yes No
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (50% in 27 min) Yes (47% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:00 hr 1:41 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 08:20 hr
Watching video - 12:40 hr
Gaming - 06:06 hr
Standby - 91 hr
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8000 x 6000
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens - 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Ultrawide: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.7
Focal length 26 mm 25 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-600 Samsung GN8
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Sony IMX355 Sony IMX712
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.14 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 145
Zoom - 99
Samples - Photo samples of Google Pixel 9a from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 4032 x 3024
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 25 mm 20 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV20B CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced April 2025 March 2025
Release date April 2025 April 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $349 $499
Successor - - Google Pixel 10a
SAR (head) - 0.99 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.39 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
2 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 2

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!