Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on April 24, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, which is powered by Exynos 2400e and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
  • Comes with 2850 mAh larger battery capacity: 7550 vs 4700 mAh
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 25W)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • 16% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2292K versus 1977K)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • 16% higher pixel density (447 vs 385 PPI)
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
104.9
(Excellent)
Value Index
65.9
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.83 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2772 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 447 ppi 385 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1300 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 1900 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Gorilla Glass Victus Plus
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1% 88%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space - 100%
PWM - 120 Hz
Response time - 2 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.1 mm (6.42 inches) 162 mm (6.38 inches)
Width 77.93 mm (3.07 inches) 77.3 mm (3.04 inches)
Thickness 7.98 mm (0.31 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 213 g (7.51 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.11/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Samsung Exynos 2400e
Max clock 3210 MHz 3110 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.11 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 825 Xclipse 940
GPU shading units 1024 768
GPU clock 1150 MHz 1095 MHz
FLOPS ~2355.2 GFLOPS ~3406.8 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
18498
Compute Score (GPU) 18498 16611
Single-core score 2002 2045
Multi-core score 7029 6397
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2292541
1977269
CPU 660045 675682
GPU 807212 670589
Memory 351865 229976
UX 473419 401022
Total score 2292541 1977269
Samples [84 tests] [55 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 82% 70%
Graphics test 13 FPS 13 FPS
Graphics score 1688 1769
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 29 FPS 29 FPS
Section 1 33 FPS 35 FPS
Section 2 29 FPS 28 FPS
Section 3 24 FPS 24 FPS
Graphics score 7542 7699
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 22 FPS -
Graphics score 3705 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15610 15997
Video editing 7765 8031
Photo editing 30492 33878
Data manipulation 14151 12347
Writing score 18243 19836

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-13 (Mimi)AnTuTu 122561461
📘 2026-09-27 (Mattzuuu)AnTuTu 122550072
📘 2026-09-22 (Xiaomi Redmi turbo 4 pro)AnTuTu 122599873
📘 2026-09-18 -> JepbismudAnTuTu 122451211
📘 2026-09-17 (Siyam Rahman)AnTuTu 122509031
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-12 -> bo177575AnTuTu 122370118
📘 2026-10-12 (Abs)AnTuTu 112053895
📘 2026-09-21 (Vishnu)AnTuTu 122276561
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle81%
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShAnTuTu 122134029

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4800 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3.0 One UI 8.0
OS size - 23.5 GB
OS updates - 4 years
Security updates - 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7550 mAh 4700 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 25 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (50% in 27 min) Yes (56% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:00 hr 1:10 hr
Battery cycles - 2000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 07:20 hr
Watching video - 13:33 hr
Gaming - 05:11 hr
Standby - 129 hr
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8160 x 6120
Zoom Digital Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens - 123°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 8 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-600 Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 8 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Focal length - 75 mm
Sensor - OmniVision OV08A10
Sensor size - 1/4.4" (≈ 0.23 inch)
Pixel size - 1 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 13 mm
Sensor Sony IMX355 Samsung S5K3L6
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.14 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 60
Preview - 69
Zoom - 126
Samples - Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 3648 x 2736
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 25 mm 26 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV20B Samsung S5K3J1
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/2.65" (≈ 0.38 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 20
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced April 2025 September 2024
Release date April 2025 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $349 $649
Successor - - Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
SAR (head) - 0.86 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.29 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Not included
Further details
Notes on Galaxy S24 FE:
    - The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display, performance, and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro. But if the camera, connectivity, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
29 (60.4%)
19 (39.6%)
Total votes: 48

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!