Tensor G2 vs A13 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Google Tensor G2 (Mali-G710 MP7) with the older 6-core Apple A13 Bionic (Apple A13 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor G2
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Performs 21% better in floating-point computations
  • 8% higher CPU clock speed (2850 vs 2650 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 8%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1186K vs 1101K
Pros of Apple A13 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~45%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Tensor G2 +8%
1186373
1101851
CPU 384056 296803
GPU 278383 301818
Memory 220709 149834
UX 303255 353396
Total score 1186373 1101851
Samples [54 tests] [47 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect DeviceFacts scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1461
A13 Bionic +20%
1749
Multi-Core Score
3867
3989
Asset compression 149.9 MB/sec 146.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 99.9 pages/sec 90.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 110.2 Mpixels/sec 103.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 74.2 images/sec 85.1 images/sec
HDR 105.5 Mpixels/sec 130.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.7 images/sec 13.9 images/sec
Photo processing 35.1 images/sec 38.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.26 Mpixels/sec 4.69 Mpixels/sec
Samples 26 tests 12 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4715
A13 Bionic +195%
13902
Background blur 6.68 images/sec 20.3 images/sec
Face detection 3.96 images/sec 25.6 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.44 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.68 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.2 Gpixels/sec 0.77 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 11.5 Gpixels/sec 45.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 972.6 FPS 1367.9 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 17 tests 8 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 702 -
Stability 78% -
Graphics test 5 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 2564
Stability - 74%
Graphics test - 10 FPS
Section 1 - 12 FPS
Section 2 - 10 FPS
Section 3 - 7 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1821
A13 Bionic +10%
2001
Score 1821 2001
Stability 77% 70%
Graphics test 10 FPS 11 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
10994
Web score 7923 -
Video editing score 6434 -
Data manipulation score 11061 -
Photo editing score 18842 -
Writing score 15053 -
Phones tested 5 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 60 FPS
[High]
World of Tanks Blitz - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Apple iPhone 11 Pro
828 x 1792
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Google Tensor G2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 -> putkin_prosrochka59AnTuTu 121477460
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> Kimash333AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Kimash333)AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> nanamondAnTuTu 111196742
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 -> shu-AnTuTu 111126520
Apple A13 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Gigant)Geekbench 6 GPU13778
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Gigant)Geekbench 6 CPU1788 / 4241
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Gigant)AnTuTu 111115933
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (Deni)AnTuTu 11824750
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Π•Π²Π³Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ :))AnTuTu 111178640

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tensor G2 and A13 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.65 GHz – Lightning
4x 1.6 GHz – Thunder
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2850 MHz 2650 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.4-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 8 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 5 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 8.5 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G710 MP7 Apple A13 GPU
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 848 MHz 1230 MHz
Pipelines 7 4
Shading units 64 64
Total shaders 448 256
FLOPS 759.8 Gigaflops 629.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2688 x 1242
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300g -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced October 2022 September 2019
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number GS201 (S5P9855) APL1W85
Successor - Google Tensor G5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
185 (51.2%)
176 (48.8%)
Total votes: 361

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A13 Bionic and Tensor G2, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Tyson September 2, 2023 at 05:12 PM
The G2 overall is better for general hardware but considering Apple's unmatched software support even Samsung has trouble keeping up.
+27 Reply