Kirin 9020 vs Kirin 8020

We compared two 8-core processors: HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (with Maleoon 920 graphics) and Kirin 8020 (Maleoon 920). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9020
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 21%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 1383K vs 1146K
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2500 vs 2285 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Kirin 9020 +21%
1383793
1146138
CPU 484142 510762
GPU 269177 139259
Memory 340806 243962
UX 289668 252155
Total score 1383793 1146138
Samples [10 tests] [6 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1370
1389
Multi-Core Score
4446
4125
Asset compression 169.6 MB/sec 155.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 129.9 pages/sec 101.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 126.6 Mpixels/sec 117.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 85.1 images/sec 60.2 images/sec
HDR 118.5 Mpixels/sec 95.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.7 images/sec 11.9 images/sec
Photo processing 43.4 images/sec 34.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.21 Mpixels/sec 4.78 Mpixels/sec
Samples 7 tests 3 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 9020 +104%
4881
2393
Background blur 6.04 images/sec 3.66 images/sec
Face detection 3.28 images/sec 1.76 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.32 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.26 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 20.6 Gpixels/sec 10.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 568.2 FPS 299.5 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 6 tests Less than 3

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Kirin 8020 +11%
504
Score 454 504
Graphics test 3 FPS 4 FPS

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-13 (AndreyK)AnTuTu 111372431
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> LeofMateAnTuTu 111291607
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-22 (A_s_t_r_a)AnTuTu 111328024
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-04-18 (Antonio)AnTuTu 111395526
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-02-25 (BlizardRx)AnTuTu 111337422
HiSilicon Kirin 8020
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-09 (vjjj)Geekbench 6 GPU2672
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-09 (hu)Geekbench 6 CPU1204 / 4209
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-04-11 (yang)AnTuTu 111156650
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-04-09 (่ƒกไธ€ๅฎ)AnTuTu 111146138
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-03-26 (diesel532)AnTuTu 111003667

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Kirin 9020 and Kirin 8020

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.5 GHz โ€“ TaiShan V121
3x 2.15 GHz โ€“ TaiShan V120
4x 1.6 GHz โ€“ Taishan-Little
1x 2.285 GHz โ€“
3x 2.05 GHz โ€“
4x 1.3 GHz โ€“
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2500 MHz 2285 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 10 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Manufacturing SMIC SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Maleoon 920 Maleoon 920
Architecture Maleoon Maleoon
GPU frequency 840 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 4 4
Shading units 256 256
Total shaders 1024 1024
FLOPS 1720.3 Gigaflops 860.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci Da Vinci

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS, 1K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Balong 6000 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps -
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.4 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2024 May 2025
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number Hi36C0V110 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
41 (63.1%)
24 (36.9%)
Total votes: 65

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 8020 and Kirin 9020, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Kaiju November 19, 2025 at 10:03 PM
I'm pretty sure the reason 8020 has higher score than 9020 is because the 8020 is a newer chipset and therefore has higher optimisations. Smic said they got better yeild this year on their CPU process over last year so that checks out
+2 Reply
Avatar
Harar November 14, 2025 at 04:55 PM
Very Funny..........
0 Reply
a7med August 5, 2025 at 10:04 PM
some thing is wrong plz update @Serhii
+8 Reply
Avatar
Idk July 6, 2025 at 08:22 AM
The gaming performance of the 8020 should be lower than that of the 9020 because they have the same GPU but the 9020 has far better CPU performance
+13 Reply
Avatar
Ramdhan June 26, 2025 at 03:53 PM
Why is the CPU and GPU score higher on kirin 8020?Even though the CPU clock is higher on the Kirin 9020 and the GPU is the same
+6 Reply
Avatar
akp831 June 27, 2025 at 05:47 AM
Maybe the software is more optimized for the Kirin 8020 (Clock speeds is'nt everything)
+9 Reply