Kirin 980 vs Kirin 820

We compared two 8-core processors: HiSilicon Kirin 980 (with Mali-G76 MP10 graphics) and Kirin 820 (Mali-G57 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 980
  • Shows better (up to 21%) AnTuTu 11 score – 736K vs 610K
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2600 vs 2360 MHz)
  • Supports 7% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 31.78 GB/s)
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 820
  • Higher GPU frequency (~18%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Kirin 980 +21%
736755
610097
CPU 322481 251791
GPU 107109 86005
Memory 146249 129622
UX 160916 142679
Total score 736755 610097
Samples [37 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Kirin 980 +11%
928
836
Multi-Core Score
Kirin 980 +17%
2875
2458
Asset compression 128.6 MB/sec 130.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 75 pages/sec 53.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 97.4 Mpixels/sec 86 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 59.9 images/sec 44.6 images/sec
HDR 85.1 Mpixels/sec 76.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.1 images/sec 9.31 images/sec
Photo processing 22.7 images/sec 22.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.74 Mpixels/sec 3.76 Mpixels/sec
Samples 18 tests 2 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 980 +29%
3657
2839
Background blur 5.49 images/sec 4.31 images/sec
Face detection 3.47 images/sec 2.11 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.28 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 12.1 Gpixels/sec 8.71 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 485.7 FPS 527.6 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 11 tests 2 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 675 -
Stability 48% -
Graphics test 4 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
8701
n/a
Web score 7820 -
Video editing score 5774 -
Data manipulation score 7472 -
Photo editing score 14221 -
Writing score 10928 -
Phones tested 6 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 56 FPS
[Ultra]
58 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 39 FPS
[Ultra]
41 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 28 FPS
[High]
27 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS
[Ultra]
48 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 33 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]
57 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Huawei Nova 5T
1080 x 2340
Huawei Honor X10
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
HiSilicon Kirin 980
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Absolute_subzero)AnTuTu 12903849
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Adiit)AnTuTu 12919298
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 -> DUYNGAnTuTu 12910146
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (DUYNG)AnTuTu 12901546
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Techdude98)AnTuTu 12803419
HiSilicon Kirin 820
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-07 (Mohammad El PHANTOM)AnTuTu 11610097
πŸ“˜ 2024-03-22 (Hexo)Geekbench 6 GPU2263
πŸ“˜ 2024-03-22 (Hexo)Geekbench 6 CPU836 / 2458
πŸ“˜ 2023-11-14 (Florin)Geekbench 6 CPU828 / 2475
πŸ“˜ 2023-11-14 (Florin)Geekbench 6 GPU2839

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Kirin 980 and Kirin 820

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2600 MHz 2360 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB -
L2 cache 4 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 6.9 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC -

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G76 MP10 Mali-G57 MP6
Architecture Bifrost 3rd gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 720 MHz 850 MHz
Pipelines 10 6
Shading units 24 32
Total shaders 240 192
FLOPS 345.6 Gigaflops 326.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.1 Gb/s 31.78 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 3120 x 1440 3360 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 24
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 1400 Mbps Up to 4600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 200 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou

Info

Announced August 2018 March 2020
Class Flagship Mid range
Official page HiSilicon Kirin 980 official site -
Successor - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
497 (67.9%)
235 (32.1%)
Total votes: 732

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 820 and Kirin 980, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Glenn May 25, 2020 at 10:50 PM
Why did you compare UFS 3.0 with UFS 2.1? You should only compare CPU, so everything else the same, the only difference is CPU
+18 Reply
root May 26, 2020 at 09:13 AM
Hi. Supported storage type doesn't affect any score in our comparisons. Is just details that can be useful for other people.
+45 Reply