Dimensity 1080 vs Tensor G2

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (with Mali-G68 MP4 graphics) and Google Tensor G2 (Mali-G710 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  • Higher GPU frequency (~12%)
Pros of Google Tensor G2
  • Performs 3.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 62%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1186K vs 731K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2850 vs 2600 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Tensor G2 +62%
1186373
CPU 286757 384056
GPU 76903 278383
Memory 134935 220709
UX 233342 303255
Total score 731937 1186373
Samples [58 tests] [54 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Tensor G2 +42%
1461
Multi-Core Score
Tensor G2 +54%
3867
Asset compression 121.2 MB/sec 149.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 63 pages/sec 99.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 89.1 Mpixels/sec 110.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 48.6 images/sec 74.2 images/sec
HDR 81 Mpixels/sec 105.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 7.24 images/sec 11.7 images/sec
Photo processing 23.8 images/sec 35.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.32 Mpixels/sec 4.26 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 26 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Tensor G2 +94%
4715
Background blur 3.62 images/sec 6.68 images/sec
Face detection 1.73 images/sec 3.96 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.35 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.2 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 7.4 Gpixels/sec 11.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 422.6 FPS 972.6 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 14 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Tensor G2 +200%
702
Score 234 702
Stability - 78%
Graphics test 2 FPS 5 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Tensor G2 +189%
1821
Score 631 1821
Stability 99% 77%
Graphics test 3 FPS 10 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11890
10994
Web score 10948 7923
Video editing score 7467 6434
Data manipulation score 10634 11061
Photo editing score 18941 18842
Writing score 14594 15053
Phones tested 4 models 5 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 38 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 62 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 83 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 37 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 86 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5G
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 1080
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Ano)Geekbench 6 GPU2720
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Anonymous)Geekbench 6 CPU1020 / 2514
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 -> PolarisDeOstianAnTuTu 11780307
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (Polaris)AnTuTu 11780307
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Ditthaze)AnTuTu 11731937
Google Tensor G2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 -> putkin_prosrochka59AnTuTu 121477460
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> Kimash333AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Kimash333)AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> nanamondAnTuTu 111196742
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 -> shu-AnTuTu 111126520

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 1080 and Tensor G2

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2600 MHz 2850 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 6 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 7 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Mali-G710 MP7
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 950 MHz 848 MHz
Pipelines 4 7
Shading units 32 64
Total shaders 128 448
FLOPS 243.2 Gigaflops 759.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Exynos 5300g
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2770 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1250 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2022 October 2022
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number MT6877V/TTZA GS201 (S5P9855)
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 1080 official site -
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 7050 - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
19 (29.2%)
46 (70.8%)
Total votes: 65

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G2 and Dimensity 1080, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!