Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Dimensity 7050 vs A13 Bionic – what's better?

Dimensity 7050 vs A13 Bionic

Dimensity 7050
VS
A13 Bionic
Dimensity 7050
A13 Bionic

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (Mali-G68 MP4) with the older 6-core Apple A13 Bionic (Apple A13 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7050
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)
Pros of Apple A13 Bionic
  • Performs 2.6x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 37%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1101K vs 806K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~29%)
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Dimensity 7050
vs
A13 Bionic

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Dimensity 7050
806012
A13 Bionic +37%
1101851
CPU 310680 296803
GPU 80663 301818
Memory 176922 149834
UX 237747 353396
Total score 806012 1101851
Samples [29 tests] [47 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect DeviceFacts scores.
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Dimensity 7050
1061
A13 Bionic +65%
1749
Multi-Core Score
Dimensity 7050
2398
A13 Bionic +66%
3989
Asset compression 117.2 MB/sec 146.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 61.2 pages/sec 90.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 88 Mpixels/sec 103.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 44.8 images/sec 85.1 images/sec
HDR 76.7 Mpixels/sec 130.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.71 images/sec 13.9 images/sec
Photo processing 21.3 images/sec 38.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.21 Mpixels/sec 4.69 Mpixels/sec
Samples 18 tests 12 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Dimensity 7050
2392
A13 Bionic +481%
13902
Background blur 3.79 images/sec 20.3 images/sec
Face detection 1.88 images/sec 25.6 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.44 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.68 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.77 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 7.13 Gpixels/sec 45.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 393.6 FPS 1367.9 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 7 tests 8 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 233 -
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 2564
Stability - 74%
Graphics test - 10 FPS
Section 1 - 12 FPS
Section 2 - 10 FPS
Section 3 - 7 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 2001
Stability - 70%
Graphics test - 11 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9630 -
Video editing score 5765 -
Data manipulation score 8000 -
Photo editing score 28539 -
Writing score 15985 -
Phones tested 5 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 60 FPS
[High]
World of Tanks Blitz - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Apple iPhone 11 Pro
828 x 1792
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Ohm)AnTuTu 12805828
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Thun)AnTuTu 12874833
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (Jedrick)AnTuTu 11843534
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 (MymySupremacy)AnTuTu 11839005
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 (Arda1)AnTuTu 11874742
Add View all (42)
Apple A13 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Gigant)Geekbench 6 GPU13778
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Gigant)Geekbench 6 CPU1788 / 4241
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Gigant)AnTuTu 111115933
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (Deni)AnTuTu 11824750
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Π•Π²Π³Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ :))AnTuTu 111178640
Add View all (65)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 7050 and A13 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55		 2x 2.65 GHz – Lightning
4x 1.6 GHz – Thunder
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2600 MHz 2650 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 8 MB
Process 6 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 8.5 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Apple A13 GPU
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 950 MHz 1230 MHz
Pipelines 4 4
Shading units 32 64
Total shaders 128 256
FLOPS 243.2 Gigaflops 629.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 550 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2688 x 1242
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP -
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 2770 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1250 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced May 2023 September 2019
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number MT6877, MT6877V/TTZA APL1W85
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 7050 official site -
Successor - - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
22 (31.9%)
47 (68.1%)
Total votes: 69

Related Comparisons

1. Apple A13 Bionic vs Apple A14 Bionic (9)
2. Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (6)
3. Apple A13 Bionic vs Apple A12 Bionic
4. Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (16)
5. MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (1)
6. MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (31)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (7)
8. MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs MediaTek Helio G99
9. MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (10)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A13 Bionic and Dimensity 7050, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
EnglishРусский