Dimensity 8100 vs Tensor G2

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (with Mali-G610 MP6 graphics) and Google Tensor G2 (Mali-G710 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor G2
  • Performs 15% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 9%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1186K vs 1092K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1092605
Tensor G2 +9%
1186373
CPU 408979 384056
GPU 172618 278383
Memory 201895 220709
UX 309113 303255
Total score 1092605 1186373
Samples [52 tests] [54 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Tensor G2 +28%
1461
Multi-Core Score
Tensor G2 +1%
3867
Asset compression 181.3 MB/sec 149.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 108.3 pages/sec 99.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 134.5 Mpixels/sec 110.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 88.6 images/sec 74.2 images/sec
HDR 131.3 Mpixels/sec 105.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.3 images/sec 11.7 images/sec
Photo processing 32.3 images/sec 35.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.87 Mpixels/sec 4.26 Mpixels/sec
Samples 19 tests 26 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Tensor G2 +20%
4715
Background blur 4.92 images/sec 6.68 images/sec
Face detection 2.66 images/sec 3.96 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.26 Gpixels/sec 0.35 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.2 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.79 Gpixels/sec 11.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 849.5 FPS 972.6 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 12 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Tensor G2 +24%
702
Score 564 702
Stability 92% 78%
Graphics test 4 FPS 5 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Tensor G2 +18%
1821
Score 1540 1821
Stability 91% 77%
Graphics test 9 FPS 10 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11862
10994
Web score 11581 7923
Video editing score 7037 6434
Data manipulation score 8309 11061
Photo editing score 19759 18842
Writing score 16904 15053
Phones tested 6 models 5 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 77 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 26 FPS
[High]
-
Shadowgun Legends 74 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 98 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device OnePlus Ace
1080 x 2412
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Gelu)AnTuTu 111054060
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Zuma)AnTuTu 111171695
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-21 (CrysTalesia)AnTuTu 111125997
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (bbgsqq)AnTuTu 111213935
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-09 -> Tem4kAnTuTu 111120838
Google Tensor G2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 -> putkin_prosrochka59AnTuTu 121477460
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> Kimash333AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Kimash333)AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> nanamondAnTuTu 111196742
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 -> shu-AnTuTu 111126520

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8100 and Tensor G2

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2850 MHz 2850 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 7 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G610 MP6 Mali-G710 MP7
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 860 MHz 848 MHz
Pipelines 6 7
Shading units 64 64
Total shaders 384 448
FLOPS 660.5 Gigaflops 759.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580 Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek UltraSave 2.0 Exynos 5300g
4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4700 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2022 October 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6895Z/TCZA GS201 (S5P9855)
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8100 official site -
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 8400 - Google Tensor G5
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8100:
    - There are "Max" and "Ultra" versions which are basically all the same. The Dimensity 8100 Ultra features optimized software, while the Dimensity 8100 Max boosts the clock from 2.85 GHz to 2.9 GHz.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
270 (72%)
105 (28%)
Total votes: 375

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G2 and Dimensity 8100, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Arman August 17, 2025 at 09:34 PM
A few months ago, I ran AnTuTu benchmarks on the Xiaomi 12T, and it scored 909,825 points. Just yesterday, I ran GigaBench on it, and it was 1264 single-core and 3966 multi-core.
0 Reply