Dimensity 820 vs Dimensity 800

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 820 (with Mali-G57 MP5 graphics) and Dimensity 800 (Mali-G57 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 820
  • Performs 50% better in floating-point computations
  • 30% higher CPU clock speed (2600 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~20%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
609659
612841
CPU 230405 253237
GPU 101179 84195
Memory 101782 103380
UX 176293 172029
Total score 609659 612841
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 107 MB/sec 111.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 59.9 pages/sec 56 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 95.3 Mpixels/sec 80.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 41.6 images/sec
HDR 68.7 Mpixels/sec 64.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 7.49 images/sec 6.16 images/sec
Photo processing 20.4 images/sec 22.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.79 Mpixels/sec 3.37 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 4.22 images/sec 2.97 images/sec
Face detection 2.29 images/sec 1.48 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 8.16 Gpixels/sec 5.57 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 442.2 FPS 320.9 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples Less than 3 -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 716 -
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 4 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 6330 -
Video editing score 5973 -
Data manipulation score 7518 -
Photo editing score 21803 -
Writing score 9823 -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 46 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 41 FPS
[Medium]
-
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 52 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 55 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 35 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 58 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 820
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (neko)Geekbench 7 GPU2452
πŸ“˜ 2025-01-01 (Xi Anzing)Geekbench 6 GPU2799
πŸ“˜ 2025-01-01 (Xi Anzing)Geekbench 6 CPU839 / 2312
MediaTek Dimensity 800
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2024-09-27 (JawDaw5)Geekbench 6 CPU665 / 2221

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 820 and Dimensity 800

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2600 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache 512 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 2 MB 2 MB
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP5 Mali-G57 MP4
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 900 MHz 748 MHz
Pipelines 5 4
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 160 128
FLOPS 288 Gigaflops 191.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 MediaTek APU 3.0
NPU theoretical performance 2.4 TOPS 2.4 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17.07 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 80MP, 2x 32MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2770 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1250 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced May 2020 December 2019
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6875 MT6873
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 820 official site MediaTek Dimensity 800 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
93 (91.2%)
9 (8.8%)
Total votes: 102

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 800 and Dimensity 820, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Abhijit September 1, 2020 at 07:45 PM
Please add Dimensity 800U and Snapdragon 732G to your comparison list. Also your feedback form is not available on the main site or the comparison homepage
+5 Reply
root September 1, 2020 at 07:58 PM
Thanks for your comment!) We are waiting to test 800U and after that we will publish it. The site is still in beta, so we will add it soon too.
+1 Reply
Avatar
Bram September 24, 2021 at 05:12 AM
800U is similar To 765G
+1 Reply