Dimensity 8300 vs A17 Pro

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (Mali-G615 MP6) with the older 6-core Apple A17 Pro (Apple A17 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 9%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1604K vs 1467K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple A17 Pro
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • 13% higher CPU clock speed (3780 vs 3350 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1604305
1467470
CPU 482670 374357
GPU 432750 463612
Memory 299238 184670
UX 389647 444831
Total score 1604305 1467470
Samples [103 tests] [21 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect DeviceFacts scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A17 Pro +116%
2969
Multi-Core Score
A17 Pro +80%
7599
Asset compression 174.4 MB/sec 254.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 128.6 pages/sec 166 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 146.7 Mpixels/sec 180.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 93.5 images/sec 178.7 images/sec
HDR 136.1 Mpixels/sec 240.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.2 images/sec 26.7 images/sec
Photo processing 37.6 images/sec 77.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.97 Mpixels/sec 7.76 Mpixels/sec
Samples 50 tests 32 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A17 Pro +446%
28057
Background blur 16.5 images/sec 55.5 images/sec
Face detection 9.4 images/sec 65.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.8 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.63 Gpixels/sec 1.08 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.46 Gpixels/sec 1.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.43 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.7 Gpixels/sec 87.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1671.3 FPS 3313.9 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 27 tests 22 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
A17 Pro +58%
1391
Score 881 1391
Stability 77% 71%
Graphics test 7 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
A17 Pro +65%
6089
Score 3688 6089
Stability - 73%
Graphics test 14 FPS 23 FPS
Section 1 16 FPS 29 FPS
Section 2 14 FPS 23 FPS
Section 3 12 FPS 16 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
A17 Pro +32%
3655
Score 2768 3655
Stability - 63%
Graphics test 16 FPS 21 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14649 -
Video editing score 6419 -
Data manipulation score 12555 -
Photo editing score 23328 -
Writing score 18403 -
Phones tested 2 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 -> rajeshwarshah-Oct2AnTuTu 111450232
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Putrz)AnTuTu 111440126
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 -> uravinqAnTuTu 121745585
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Michael Cheng)AnTuTu 121933824
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (MΓΌller)AnTuTu 121893547
Apple A17 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111996792
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Kuan.28)AnTuTu 111752198
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (podsolnuh)AnTuTu 111357765
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111599694
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (elio)AnTuTu 111445771

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8300 and A17 Pro

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
2x 3.78 GHz – Everest
4x 2.11 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3350 MHz 3780 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache - 16 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count - 19 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G615 MP6 Apple A17 GPU
Architecture Valhall 4rd gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1400 MHz 1398 MHz
Pipelines 6 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 768 768
FLOPS 2150.4 Gigaflops 2147.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 780 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 1290 x 2796
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek T800 Snapdragon X70
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2023 September 2023
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number MT6897 APL1V02
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8300 official site -
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 8400 - Apple A19 Pro
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8300:
    - Dimensity 8300 Ultra is identical to the Dimensity 8300 (without "Ultra") regarding technical specifications and performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
268 (84.5%)
49 (15.5%)
Total votes: 317

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A17 Pro and Dimensity 8300, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Rem January 13, 2025 at 12:21 PM
So my 14T is near far from 1500000 without tricks... AnTuTu scores in nanoreview Always lowest than truth (people practice AnTuTu with many apps on the background that's kill scoring by about 20%).. mine 335000 pts for CPU and near 560000 pts for GPU After many many tests..
0 Reply
Avatar
Rem January 13, 2025 at 12:16 PM
Because its not a Real mid range soc but a high end soc lightened, for phone range, like as im not ok to considering Xiaomi 14T likΓ© a mid range phone but a high end phone Xiaomi 14 lightened. That's was the case for 11/11t, 12/12t 13/13t.. that's thΓ© first year i Can read that T models are mid range..
+1 Reply
Avatar
Rahul November 18, 2024 at 04:27 PM
Dimensity 8300 ultra rocks
+4 Reply
Avatar
Wonder Boy March 22, 2024 at 04:33 AM
This is a joke! A mid-range MediaTek chip can handle the latest CPU from Apple!
+40 Reply