Dimensity 920 vs Dimensity 8300
We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 920 (with Mali-G68 MP4 graphics) and Dimensity 8300 (Mali-G615 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300
- Performs 8.8x better in floating-point computations
- Shows significantly better (up to 2.1x) AnTuTu 11 score β 1604K vs 750K
- Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 920
- Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
- Higher GPU frequency (~47%)
- 34% higher CPU clock speed (3350 vs 2500 MHz)
- Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 290440 | 482670 |
| GPU | 78028 | 432750 |
| Memory | 150165 | 299238 |
| UX | 231848 | 389647 |
| Total score | 750481 | 1604305 |
| Samples | [10 tests] | [103 tests] |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 117.7 MB/sec | 174.4 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 61.4 pages/sec | 128.6 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 78.8 Mpixels/sec | 146.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 43.5 images/sec | 93.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 72.3 Mpixels/sec | 136.1 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 6.73 images/sec | 12.2 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 20.2 images/sec | 37.6 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 3.25 Mpixels/sec | 4.97 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 7 tests | 50 tests |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 2.95 images/sec | 16.5 images/sec |
| Face detection | 1.44 images/sec | 9.4 images/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.09 Gpixels/sec | 0.43 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.13 Gpixels/sec | 0.63 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.1 Gpixels/sec | 0.46 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.03 Gpixels/sec | 0.13 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo matching | 6.8 Gpixels/sec | 16.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 385.1 FPS | 1671.3 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | Vulkan |
| Samples | 4 tests | 27 tests |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 232 | 881 |
| Stability | - | 77% |
| Graphics test | 2 FPS | 7 FPS |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Score | - | 3688 |
| Graphics test | - | 14 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 16 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 14 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 12 FPS |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | 633 | 2768 |
| Stability | 98% | - |
| Graphics test | 3 FPS | 16 FPS |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10805 | 14649 |
| Video editing score | 6810 | 6419 |
| Data manipulation score | 8454 | 12555 |
| Photo editing score | 34185 | 23328 |
| Writing score | 16317 | 18403 |
| Phones tested | 2 models | 2 models |
Gaming
| PUBG Mobile | 64 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 59 FPS [High] |
- |
| Fortnite | 27 FPS [Low] |
- |
| Shadowgun Legends | 68 FPS [Medium] |
- |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 59 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Genshin Impact | 46 FPS [Medium] |
- |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 53 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Device | Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus 1080 x 2400 |
- |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Recent User Tests
MediaTek Dimensity 920
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-05-03 (Hard) | AnTuTu 11 | 767408 |
| π 2026-05-03 (Γbcd) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 2269 |
| π 2026-05-03 (Γbcd) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 936 / 2318 |
| π 2026-05-03 (Γbcd) | AnTuTu 11 | 745837 |
| π 2026-03-05 (Anerierisa) | AnTuTu 11 | 750481 |
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-10-11 -> rajeshwarshah-Oct2 | AnTuTu 11 | 1450232 |
| π 2026-10-04 (Putrz) | AnTuTu 11 | 1440126 |
| π 2026-10-02 -> uravinq | AnTuTu 12 | 1745585 |
| π 2026-10-01 (Michael Cheng) | AnTuTu 12 | 1933824 |
| π 2026-09-28 (MΓΌller) | AnTuTu 12 | 1893547 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 920 and Dimensity 8300CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz β Cortex-A78 6x 2 GHz β Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.35 GHz β Cortex-A715 3x 3.2 GHz β Cortex-A715 4x 2.2 GHz β Cortex-A510 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2500 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 10 billion | - |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 4 W | 6 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2nd gen | Valhall 4rd gen |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4 | 6 |
| Shading units | 32 | 128 |
| Total shaders | 128 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 243.2 Gigaflops | 2150.4 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 780 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gb/s | 68.2 Gb/s |
| Max size | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2960 x 1440 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 320MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | - | MediaTek T800 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 2770 Mbps | Up to 5170 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 1250 Mbps | - |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | August 2021 | November 2023 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | MT6877T | MT6897 |
| Official page | MediaTek Dimensity 920 official site | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 official site |
| Successor | - MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | - MediaTek Dimensity 8400 |
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8300:
- Dimensity 8300 Ultra is identical to the Dimensity 8300 (without "Ultra") regarding technical specifications and performance.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 37