Snapdragon 680 vs Dimensity 1080

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (Mali-G68 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
  • Higher GPU frequency (~17%)
  • Performs 17% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  • Supports 201% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 73%) AnTuTu 11 score – 731K vs 424K
  • 8% higher CPU clock speed (2600 vs 2400 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
731937
CPU 185604 286757
GPU 26544 76903
Memory 114814 134935
UX 97254 233342
Total score 424216 731937
Samples [82 tests] [58 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 85.7 MB/sec 121.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 43.2 pages/sec 63 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 59.4 Mpixels/sec 89.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 15.7 images/sec 48.6 images/sec
HDR 49.8 Mpixels/sec 81 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 2.98 images/sec 7.24 images/sec
Photo processing 11.3 images/sec 23.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.59 Mpixels/sec 3.32 Mpixels/sec
Samples 35 tests 25 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 0.32 images/sec 3.62 images/sec
Face detection 0.16 images/sec 1.73 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 1.48 Gpixels/sec 7.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 26.6 FPS 422.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 20 tests 14 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 234
Graphics test - 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 172 631
Stability 97% 99%
Graphics test 1 FPS 3 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11890
Web score 7531 10948
Video editing score 4072 7467
Data manipulation score 6097 10634
Photo editing score 14785 18941
Writing score 8535 14594
Phones tested 16 models 4 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[Medium]
57 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
38 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 23 FPS
[Low]
27 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends 65 FPS
[Low]
62 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 62 FPS
[Medium]
83 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 26 FPS
[Low]
37 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 54 FPS
[Ultra]
86 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5G
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-14 (Supera05s)AnTuTu 12592776
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 -> karl1994AnTuTu 12459609
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Kostya_vesely)AnTuTu 12503787
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 -> Tran Gia Bao VNAnTuTu 12501899
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Croze)AnTuTu 12490622
MediaTek Dimensity 1080
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Ano)Geekbench 6 GPU2720
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Anonymous)Geekbench 6 CPU1020 / 2514
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 -> PolarisDeOstianAnTuTu 11780307
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (Polaris)AnTuTu 11780307
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Ditthaze)AnTuTu 11731937

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 680 and Dimensity 1080

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 610 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 1114 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 1 4
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 128 128
FLOPS 285.2 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU 3.0

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X11 -
4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 390 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 October 2022
Class Low end Mid range
Model number SM6225 MT6877V/TTZA
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 official site MediaTek Dimensity 1080 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
60 (13.1%)
399 (86.9%)
Total votes: 459

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 1080 and Snapdragon 680, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
SfripWare May 27, 2023 at 02:15 PM
Dimensity is good at all but it won't last After 2 years Like mediatek P10 battery efficiency is trash compared to 430
+103 Reply