Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 8300 – what's better?

Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 8300

Snapdragon 695
VS
Dimensity 8300
Snapdragon 695
Dimensity 8300

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (Mali-G615 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  • Performs 5x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 301% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.7x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1604K vs 592K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~67%)
  • 52% higher CPU clock speed (3350 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 695
vs
Dimensity 8300

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 695
592015
Dimensity 8300 +171%
1604305
CPU 237904 482670
GPU 56314 432750
Memory 136317 299238
UX 161480 389647
Total score 592015 1604305
Samples [83 tests] [103 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Snapdragon 695
2101
Dimensity 8300 +101%
4217
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 174.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 128.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 146.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 93.5 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 136.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 12.2 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 37.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 4.97 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 50 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Snapdragon 695
1403
Dimensity 8300 +266%
5134
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 16.5 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 9.4 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.43 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.46 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 16.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 1671.3 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 23 tests 27 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 881
Stability - 77%
Graphics test - 7 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 3688
Graphics test - 14 FPS
Section 1 - 16 FPS
Section 2 - 14 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 2768
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS 16 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Snapdragon 695
9496
Dimensity 8300 +47%
13963
Web score 9704 14649
Video editing score 3911 6419
Data manipulation score 8663 12555
Photo editing score 18151 23328
Writing score 13129 18403
Phones tested 21 models 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]		 -
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]		 -
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]		 -
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]		 -
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]		 -
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400		 -
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-08 (Oracul)AnTuTu 12647482
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
Add View all (114)
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 -> rajeshwarshah-Oct2AnTuTu 111450232
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Putrz)AnTuTu 111440126
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 -> uravinqAnTuTu 121745585
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Michael Cheng)AnTuTu 121933824
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (MΓΌller)AnTuTu 121893547
Add View all (210)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 8300

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 3350 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 6 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G615 MP6
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 4rd gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 1400 MHz
Pipelines 2 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 768
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 2150.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU 780

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 MediaTek T800
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 November 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6897
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8300 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8300:
    - Dimensity 8300 Ultra is identical to the Dimensity 8300 (without "Ultra") regarding technical specifications and performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
14 (11.8%)
105 (88.2%)
Total votes: 119

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (36)
8. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 (22)
9. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (14)
10. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (90)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8300 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
EnglishРусский