Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 778G vs Dimensity 1200 – what's better?

Snapdragon 778G vs Dimensity 1200

Snapdragon 778G
VS
Dimensity 1200
Snapdragon 778G
Dimensity 1200

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (with Adreno 642 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (Mali-G77 MP9). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (7)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  • Higher GPU frequency (~61%)
  • 25% higher CPU clock speed (3000 vs 2400 MHz)
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 23%) AnTuTu 11 score – 960K vs 783K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 778G
vs
Dimensity 1200

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 778G
783606
Dimensity 1200 +23%
960724
CPU 326426 384772
GPU 101452 144433
Memory 119484 177452
UX 236244 254067
Total score 783606 960724
Samples [113 tests] [12 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 157.1 MB/sec 168.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 70.7 pages/sec 95.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 113.9 Mpixels/sec 131.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.4 images/sec 71.4 images/sec
HDR 91.1 Mpixels/sec 117.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.1 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Photo processing 26.5 images/sec 32.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.17 Mpixels/sec 4.54 Mpixels/sec
Samples 68 tests 8 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 3.5 images/sec 6.87 images/sec
Face detection 1.57 images/sec 3.39 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.75 Gpixels/sec 14.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 370.4 FPS 838.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 26 tests 6 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 225 442
Stability - 96%
Graphics test 2 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 686 1311
Stability 99% 79%
Graphics test 4 FPS 7 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10945 9284
Video editing score 6994 6385
Data manipulation score 9642 10275
Photo editing score 24463 25491
Writing score 14285 14338
Phones tested 11 models 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[High]		 68 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 60 FPS
[High]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]		 28 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 49 FPS
[Ultra]		 71 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 94 FPS
[Ultra]		 88 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
[High]		 51 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]		 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400		 Oppo Realme GT Neo
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Xpns)AnTuTu 12936843
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 (RM_Phil)Geekbench 7 CPU808 / 3022
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 (RM_Phil)AnTuTu 12769103
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-10 (Ziade)AnTuTu 12827927
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (deramen)AnTuTu 12880897
Add View all (193)
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekbench 6 GPU4546
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekbench 6 CPU1112 / 3313
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisAnTuTu 11960724
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Π’Π°Ρ€Ρ„ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΠΉ Π˜Π³ΠΎΡ€Π΅Π²ΠΈΡ‡)AnTuTu 11773735
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 (Bavarik)AnTuTu 11961761
Add View all (21)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G and Dimensity 1200

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 3000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 32 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 320 KB
L3 cache - 8 MB
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4.3 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642 Mali-G77 MP9
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 550 MHz 886 MHz
Pipelines 2 9
Shading units 256 32
Total shaders 512 288
FLOPS 563.2 Gigaflops 510.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 MediaTek APU 3.0
NPU theoretical performance - 4.5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X53 Helio M70
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 19
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2021 January 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7325 MT6893
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site MediaTek Dimensity 1200 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G - MediaTek Dimensity 9500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2463 (24.6%)
7541 (75.4%)
Total votes: 10004

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Helio G99 (10)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (30)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (13)
6. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (22)
8. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (4)
9. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (2)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 1200 and Snapdragon 778G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Robo_koi November 18, 2021 at 04:44 AM
Why didn't Snapdragon make the clock speed higher for the 778g it wouldn't have cost them anything apart from maybe TDP increase and would have been closer in performance to the Dimensity 1200. They missed out on a really solid upper midrange chip.
+57 Reply
Avatar
Guest November 27, 2021 at 08:51 PM
The main reason was most people wouldn't notice the power difference during normal use unless they do gaming, Also to make the chip power efficient.
+60 Reply
Avatar
Raghav April 11, 2022 at 05:59 AM
If they provided 10W TDP, then their Snapdragon 870 would look like a bad deal and there might be a reason for power efficiency.
+16 Reply
Avatar
Suraj Solanki October 9, 2021 at 04:34 AM
Clock speed 2.4MHz vs 3MHz not 2400MHz or 3000MHz Change that. And about processor Dimensity 1200 phone is flagship level processor still it costs less than Snapdragon 778 phones Why ?
+150 Reply
Avatar
Shubham October 23, 2021 at 08:58 AM
For your information 2400Mhz = 2.4 Ghz ok. So what's written on site is correct.
+48 Reply
Avatar
Joe Mama November 25, 2021 at 06:11 PM
It's 2.4GHz, and 3GHz, which translates to 2400MHz and 3000MHz. Check yourself before you correct someone.
+35 Reply
Avatar
Sysadmin SoC June 1, 2023 at 09:10 AM
The cost of everything from the West is artificially inflated. When the MTK-1200 is optimized, it will run rings around SD chips.
+8 Reply
EnglishРусский