Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 778G vs Dimensity 8300 – what's better?

Snapdragon 778G vs Dimensity 8300

Snapdragon 778G
VS
Dimensity 8300
Snapdragon 778G
Dimensity 8300

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (with Adreno 642 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (Mali-G615 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  • Performs 3.8x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 166% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2.5x)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1604K vs 783K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • 40% higher CPU clock speed (3350 vs 2400 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 778G
vs
Dimensity 8300

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 778G
783606
Dimensity 8300 +105%
1604305
CPU 326426 482670
GPU 101452 432750
Memory 119484 299238
UX 236244 389647
Total score 783606 1604305
Samples [113 tests] [103 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 157.1 MB/sec 174.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 70.7 pages/sec 128.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 113.9 Mpixels/sec 146.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.4 images/sec 93.5 images/sec
HDR 91.1 Mpixels/sec 136.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.1 images/sec 12.2 images/sec
Photo processing 26.5 images/sec 37.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.17 Mpixels/sec 4.97 Mpixels/sec
Samples 68 tests 50 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 3.5 images/sec 16.5 images/sec
Face detection 1.57 images/sec 9.4 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.43 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.46 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.75 Gpixels/sec 16.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 370.4 FPS 1671.3 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 26 tests 27 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 225 881
Stability - 77%
Graphics test 2 FPS 7 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 3688
Graphics test - 14 FPS
Section 1 - 16 FPS
Section 2 - 14 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 686 2768
Stability 99% -
Graphics test 4 FPS 16 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Snapdragon 778G
12246
Dimensity 8300 +14%
13963
Web score 10945 14649
Video editing score 6994 6419
Data manipulation score 9642 12555
Photo editing score 24463 23328
Writing score 14285 18403
Phones tested 11 models 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[High]		 -
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]		 -
Shadowgun Legends 49 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
World of Tanks Blitz 94 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
[High]		 -
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Device Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400		 -
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Xpns)AnTuTu 12936843
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 (RM_Phil)Geekbench 7 CPU808 / 3022
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 (RM_Phil)AnTuTu 12769103
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-10 (Ziade)AnTuTu 12827927
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (deramen)AnTuTu 12880897
Add View all (193)
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 -> rajeshwarshah-Oct2AnTuTu 111450232
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Putrz)AnTuTu 111440126
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 -> uravinqAnTuTu 121745585
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Michael Cheng)AnTuTu 121933824
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (MΓΌller)AnTuTu 121893547
Add View all (210)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G and Dimensity 8300

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 3350 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache 2 MB -
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 6 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642 Mali-G615 MP6
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 4rd gen
GPU frequency 550 MHz 1400 MHz
Pipelines 2 6
Shading units 256 128
Total shaders 512 768
FLOPS 563.2 Gigaflops 2150.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 MediaTek APU 780

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem X53 MediaTek T800
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2021 November 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7325 MT6897
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site MediaTek Dimensity 8300 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G - MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8300:
    - Dimensity 8300 Ultra is identical to the Dimensity 8300 (without "Ultra") regarding technical specifications and performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
52 (14.9%)
297 (85.1%)
Total votes: 349

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (6)
2. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (4)
3. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (14)
4. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (90)
5. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 (51)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (13)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 1380 (25)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (30)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8300 and Snapdragon 778G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
EnglishРусский