Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 778G vs Snapdragon 680 – what's better?

Snapdragon 778G vs Snapdragon 680

Snapdragon 778G
VS
Snapdragon 680
Snapdragon 778G
Snapdragon 680

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (with Adreno 642 graphics) and Snapdragon 680 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (4)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 85%) AnTuTu 11 score – 783K vs 424K
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2x)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 778G
vs
Snapdragon 680

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 778G +85%
783606
Snapdragon 680
424216
CPU 326426 185604
GPU 101452 26544
Memory 119484 114814
UX 236244 97254
Total score 783606 424216
Samples [113 tests] [82 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 157.1 MB/sec 85.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 70.7 pages/sec 43.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 113.9 Mpixels/sec 59.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.4 images/sec 15.7 images/sec
HDR 91.1 Mpixels/sec 49.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.1 images/sec 2.98 images/sec
Photo processing 26.5 images/sec 11.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.17 Mpixels/sec 2.59 Mpixels/sec
Samples 68 tests 35 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 3.5 images/sec 0.32 images/sec
Face detection 1.57 images/sec 0.16 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.75 Gpixels/sec 1.48 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 370.4 FPS 26.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 26 tests 20 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 225 -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 686 172
Stability 99% 97%
Graphics test 4 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10945 7531
Video editing score 6994 4072
Data manipulation score 9642 6097
Photo editing score 24463 14785
Writing score 14285 8535
Phones tested 11 models 16 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[High]		 59 FPS
[Medium]
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]		 23 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 49 FPS
[Ultra]		 65 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 94 FPS
[Ultra]		 62 FPS
[Medium]
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
[High]		 26 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]		 54 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400		 Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Xpns)AnTuTu 12936843
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 (RM_Phil)Geekbench 7 CPU808 / 3022
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 (RM_Phil)AnTuTu 12769103
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-10 (Ziade)AnTuTu 12827927
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (deramen)AnTuTu 12880897
Add View all (193)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-14 (Supera05s)AnTuTu 12592776
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 -> karl1994AnTuTu 12459609
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Kostya_vesely)AnTuTu 12503787
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 -> Tran Gia Bao VNAnTuTu 12501899
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Croze)AnTuTu 12490622
Add View all (111)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G and Snapdragon 680

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 2 MB -
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642 Adreno 610
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 550 MHz 1114 MHz
Pipelines 2 1
Shading units 256 128
Total shaders 512 128
FLOPS 563.2 Gigaflops 285.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X53 X11
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 13
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2021 October 2021
Class Mid range Low end
Model number SM7325 SM6225
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
596 (85.4%)
102 (14.6%)
Total votes: 698

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (30)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (13)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 1380 (25)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Helio G85 (13)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (35)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Helio G91 (2)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 680 and Snapdragon 778G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Yasin Arafat November 6, 2024 at 04:06 AM
778g has hitting issue, Battery draining issue, also bit connectivity issue compared to 680. 680 is more power efficient, better connectivity and no battery draining issue overnight. This Soc always stays cool for normal usages. But 778G feels warmer when using normal tasks.
0 Reply
Avatar
680 June 8, 2024 at 05:57 PM
Hello guys, I think the Snapdragon 680 is much better because it has a better battery life, unlike the 778, and it outperforms the 778. Lol!
+15 Reply
Avatar
Hyra September 29, 2025 at 12:14 AM
Fake! Snadragon 778G is much better.
+2 Reply
Avatar
Cap May 19, 2026 at 10:44 AM
cope harder lil bro, 778 is faster and it's not close
+1 Reply
EnglishРусский