Snapdragon 855 vs Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (with Adreno 640 graphics) and Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  • Performs 2.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 101% higher memory bandwidth (34.13 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 39%) AnTuTu 11 score – 824K vs 592K
  • 29% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2200 MHz)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Higher GPU frequency (~44%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
824513
CPU 314517 237904
GPU 125449 56314
Memory 150134 136317
UX 234413 161480
Total score 824513 592015
Samples [39 tests] [83 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 126.8 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 74.2 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 88 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 57.7 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 89.3 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.07 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 20.2 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.06 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 29 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 4.31 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 1.84 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 8.72 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 444 FPS 245.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 19 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 876 360
Stability 86% 98%
Graphics test 5 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
10497
Web score 8813 9704
Video editing score 5956 3911
Data manipulation score 8239 8663
Photo editing score 22485 18151
Writing score 13084 13129
Phones tested 8 models 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS
[Ultra]
66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 56 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Ultra]
24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS
[Ultra]
67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS
[Ultra]
57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 57 FPS
[Ultra]
42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
1080 x 2340
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Zakazaka1273)AnTuTu 11855696
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Pon)AnTuTu 121038764
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Stanley)AnTuTu 12969794
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Stanley)AnTuTu 11847934
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (pakasraka)AnTuTu 11763477
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-08 (Oracul)AnTuTu 12647482
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2840 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 6 nanometers
Transistor count 6.7 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 640 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 585 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 3 2
Shading units 256 128
Total shaders 768 256
FLOPS 898.5 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 690 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.13 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2018 October 2021
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number SM8150 SM6375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
873 (86.4%)
137 (13.6%)
Total votes: 1010

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 855, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!