Exynos 1380 vs Dimensity 1200

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1380 (with Mali-G68 MP5 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (Mali-G77 MP9). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1380
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~7%)
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Exynos 1380
  • Performs 68% better in floating-point computations
  • 25% higher CPU clock speed (3000 vs 2400 MHz)
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 25%) AnTuTu 11 score – 960K vs 767K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
767711
960724
CPU 320484 384772
GPU 91141 144433
Memory 113558 177452
UX 242528 254067
Total score 767711 960724
Samples [113 tests] [12 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1143
Multi-Core Score
3353
Asset compression 146.7 MB/sec 168.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 64.4 pages/sec 95.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 109.8 Mpixels/sec 131.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 53.7 images/sec 71.4 images/sec
HDR 95.9 Mpixels/sec 117.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.4 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Photo processing 27.2 images/sec 32.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.23 Mpixels/sec 4.54 Mpixels/sec
Samples 56 tests 8 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4595
Background blur 4.46 images/sec 6.87 images/sec
Face detection 2.17 images/sec 3.39 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.21 Gpixels/sec 14.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 538 FPS 838.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 35 tests 6 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 279 442
Stability 98% 96%
Graphics test 2 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1311
Score 808 1311
Stability 99% 79%
Graphics test 4 FPS 7 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
12792
Web score 10597 9284
Video editing score 7345 6385
Data manipulation score 10909 10275
Photo editing score 25069 25491
Writing score 16185 14338
Phones tested 8 models 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 68 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[High]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 71 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 88 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 51 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Oppo Realme GT Neo
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1380
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (Abdou DZ)AnTuTu 12866883
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (Lazy)AnTuTu 11893295
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 -> VAMPRAnTuTu 12866171
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (bes)AnTuTu 12872304
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 -> Danielfikri98_AnTuTu 12843108
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekbench 6 GPU4546
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekbench 6 CPU1112 / 3313
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisAnTuTu 11960724
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Π’Π°Ρ€Ρ„ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΠΉ Π˜Π³ΠΎΡ€Π΅Π²ΠΈΡ‡)AnTuTu 11773735
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 (Bavarik)AnTuTu 11961761

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1380 and Dimensity 1200

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 3000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 32 KB
L2 cache - 320 KB
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
Process 5 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4.3 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G77 MP9
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 949 MHz 886 MHz
Pipelines 5 9
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 160 288
FLOPS 303.7 Gigaflops 510.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 3.0
NPU theoretical performance 4.9 TOPS 4.5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Helio M70
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 19
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3790 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced February 2023 January 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8835 MT6893
Official page Samsung Exynos 1380 official site MediaTek Dimensity 1200 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - MediaTek Dimensity 9500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
37 (17.8%)
171 (82.2%)
Total votes: 208

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 1200 and Exynos 1380, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!