Exynos 1380 vs Dimensity 920

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1380 (with Mali-G68 MP5 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 920 (Mali-G68 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1380
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 920
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
  • Performs 25% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 920
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
767711
750481
CPU 320484 290440
GPU 91141 78028
Memory 113558 150165
UX 242528 231848
Total score 767711 750481
Samples [113 tests] [10 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1008
Multi-Core Score
2710
Asset compression 146.7 MB/sec 117.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 64.4 pages/sec 61.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 109.8 Mpixels/sec 78.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 53.7 images/sec 43.5 images/sec
HDR 95.9 Mpixels/sec 72.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.4 images/sec 6.73 images/sec
Photo processing 27.2 images/sec 20.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.23 Mpixels/sec 3.25 Mpixels/sec
Samples 56 tests 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
3048
Background blur 4.46 images/sec 2.95 images/sec
Face detection 2.17 images/sec 1.44 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.21 Gpixels/sec 6.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 538 FPS 385.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 35 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
279
Score 279 232
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
808
Score 808 633
Stability 99% 98%
Graphics test 4 FPS 3 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
12792
13347
Web score 10597 10805
Video editing score 7345 6810
Data manipulation score 10909 8454
Photo editing score 25069 34185
Writing score 16185 16317
Phones tested 8 models 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 64 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 59 FPS
[High]
Fortnite - 27 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 68 FPS
[Medium]
World of Tanks Blitz - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 46 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 53 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1380
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (Abdou DZ)AnTuTu 12866883
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (Lazy)AnTuTu 11893295
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 -> VAMPRAnTuTu 12866171
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (bes)AnTuTu 12872304
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 -> Danielfikri98_AnTuTu 12843108
MediaTek Dimensity 920
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-03 (Hard)AnTuTu 11767408
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-03 (Ábcd)Geekbench 6 GPU2269
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-03 (Ábcd)Geekbench 6 CPU936 / 2318
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-03 (Ábcd)AnTuTu 11745837
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-05 (Anerierisa)AnTuTu 11750481

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1380 and Dimensity 920

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache 4 MB 2 MB
Process 5 nanometers 6 nanometers
Transistor count - 10 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 949 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 5 4
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 160 128
FLOPS 303.7 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 4.9 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3790 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced February 2023 August 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8835 MT6877T
Official page Samsung Exynos 1380 official site MediaTek Dimensity 920 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
184 (38.9%)
289 (61.1%)
Total votes: 473

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 920 and Exynos 1380, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Ronel March 19, 2023 at 03:32 AM
I prefer exynos 1380 compare to dimensity 920 cause exynos has 4 big core that can multitask plus it has the fastest data connectivity, and I'm sure it can support longer software updates.
+75 Reply
Avatar
Not a bot August 17, 2023 at 03:59 PM
You are really right. BUT samsung is really bad at chip fabrication. It may heat more than dm 920
+36 Reply