Exynos 1380 vs Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1380 (with Mali-G68 MP5 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1380
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 30%) AnTuTu 11 score – 767K vs 592K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 42% better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
767711
CPU 320484 237904
GPU 91141 56314
Memory 113558 136317
UX 242528 161480
Total score 767711 592015
Samples [113 tests] [83 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1008
Multi-Core Score
2710
Asset compression 146.7 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 64.4 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 109.8 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 53.7 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 95.9 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.4 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 27.2 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.23 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 56 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 1380 +117%
3048
Background blur 4.46 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 2.17 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.21 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 538 FPS 245.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 35 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 279 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Exynos 1380 +124%
808
Score 808 360
Stability 99% 98%
Graphics test 4 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
12792
Web score 10597 9704
Video editing score 7345 3911
Data manipulation score 10909 8663
Photo editing score 25069 18151
Writing score 16185 13129
Phones tested 8 models 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite - 24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1380
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (Abdou DZ)AnTuTu 12866883
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (Lazy)AnTuTu 11893295
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 -> VAMPRAnTuTu 12866171
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (bes)AnTuTu 12872304
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 -> Danielfikri98_AnTuTu 12843108
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-08 (Oracul)AnTuTu 12647482
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1380 and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 5 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP5 Adreno 619
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 949 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 5 2
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 160 256
FLOPS 303.7 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 686
NPU theoretical performance 4.9 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3790 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced February 2023 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8835 SM6375
Official page Samsung Exynos 1380 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1068 (81.4%)
244 (18.6%)
Total votes: 1312

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Exynos 1380, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
skibidi dop dop yes yes February 16, 2025 at 07:57 AM
Sigma Skibidi. Samsung is the best.
0 Reply
Avatar
hmm... June 23, 2024 at 10:28 AM
I look better with Snapdragon 695. Of course, I made Exynos well, but not many people would buy to play at this performance, and I think I can only think of it because I prefer a 695 for a full-time ratio
+46 Reply
Avatar
Mrsch July 3, 2024 at 08:18 AM
Nah, 1380 is better in every aspect.
+34 Reply
Avatar
Pedro May 1, 2023 at 01:54 AM
Apparently, the Exynos 1380 has 80 shading units
+48 Reply
Avatar
Hii April 13, 2023 at 01:32 PM
Not enough tests for 1380, can't make a decision based on no info, lol
+76 Reply