Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 1380 vs Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 – what's better?

Exynos 1380 vs Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2

Exynos 1380
VS
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
Exynos 1380
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1380 (with Mali-G68 MP5 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 (Adreno 725). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (4)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1380
  • Higher GPU frequency (~64%)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
  • Performs 3.9x better in floating-point computations
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Exynos 1380
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 72%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1317K vs 767K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • 21% higher CPU clock speed (2910 vs 2400 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Exynos 1380
vs
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 1380
767711
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 +72%
1317007
CPU 320484 532680
GPU 91141 166554
Memory 113558 232990
UX 242528 384783
Total score 767711 1317007
Samples [113 tests] [52 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 146.7 MB/sec 182 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 64.4 pages/sec 116.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 109.8 Mpixels/sec 137.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 53.7 images/sec 112.4 images/sec
HDR 95.9 Mpixels/sec 137.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.4 images/sec 16.1 images/sec
Photo processing 27.2 images/sec 40.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.23 Mpixels/sec 4.62 Mpixels/sec
Samples 56 tests 51 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 4.46 images/sec 7.38 images/sec
Face detection 2.17 images/sec 3.36 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.31 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.21 Gpixels/sec 11.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 538 FPS 772.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 35 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 279 614
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 5 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 808 1956
Stability 99% 85%
Graphics test 4 FPS 11 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10597 -
Video editing score 7345 -
Data manipulation score 10909 -
Photo editing score 25069 -
Writing score 16185 -
Phones tested 8 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 77 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 38 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 81 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 116 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 53 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 114 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Poco F5
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1380
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (Abdou DZ)AnTuTu 12866883
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (Lazy)AnTuTu 11893295
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 -> VAMPRAnTuTu 12866171
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (bes)AnTuTu 12872304
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 -> Danielfikri98_AnTuTu 12843108
Add View all (210)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 (Martin)AnTuTu 121421599
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Q)AnTuTu 121498717
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (Zaviee)AnTuTu 121483091
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Bers2409)AnTuTu 121442782
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Q)AnTuTu 121277293
Add View all (127)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1380 and Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55		 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.49 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2910 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache - 1024 KB
L2 cache - 2 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
Process 5 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count - 10.2 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP5 Adreno 725
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Adreno 700
GPU frequency 949 MHz 580 MHz
Pipelines 5 2
Shading units 32 512
Total shaders 160 1024
FLOPS 303.7 Gigaflops 1187.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 4.9 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2560 x 1600
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Snapdragon X62
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3790 Mbps Up to 4400 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 1600 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced February 2023 March 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8835 SM7475-AB
Official page Samsung Exynos 1380 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
36 (8.8%)
374 (91.2%)
Total votes: 410

Related Comparisons

1. Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
2. Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (25)
3. Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (9)
4. Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (17)
5. Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Samsung Exynos 1480 (9)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (19)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (51)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (9)
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (27)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 and Exynos 1380, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
NoName January 3, 2024 at 12:59 PM
Wow, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 truly is a force to be reckoned with! It's surprising that within only 3-4 years, MediaTek would pressure Qualcomm enough to release such a robust mid-range SoC. Even Qualcomm admits it might have been an oversight to provide this powerhouse with such capabilities. It rivals their Snapdragon 8 series flagship lineup, which is saying a lot!
+1 Reply
Avatar
Senn Lens YT September 29, 2023 at 06:47 AM
Both processors are excellent. The SD 7+ Gen 2 is featured in the Poco F5 and several other devices, while the Exynos 1380 powers the Galaxy A54. However, the Exynos 1380 tends to overheat more than the SD 7+ Gen 2, making it less suitable for gaming. Despite this, it handles daily tasks on the Galaxy A54 with ease. On the other hand, the Poco F5 is great for both everyday use and heavy gaming, such as Genshin Impact. Your choice ultimately depends on your preferences and needs. As for pricing, the Poco F5, with 8GB RAM and 256GB storage, is priced at RM1699, while the Galaxy A54, with similar storage and RAM, is at RM1899. During major promotions, the Poco F5 can be found for as low as RM1369 or RM1419, and the Galaxy A54 for RM1699 on platforms like Shopee or Lazada. Prices can drop even further with discount vouchers.
0 Reply
Avatar
Why Samsung?! April 2, 2023 at 05:48 AM
f the A54 came with the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, it would be stellar. However, it's equipped with an Exynos 1380, which is barely on par with the 2-year-old Snapdragon 778G. I suppose Samsung needs to recoup losses somehow since their flagships no longer use Exynos, so they discreetly incorporate the inferior Exynos into their mid-range A54, hoping nobody notices. If there's an A54s later in the year that comes with the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (like the A52 and A52s), those who buy the current A54 might as well bang their heads against a wall.
+18 Reply
Avatar
Thomas August 7, 2023 at 04:12 AM
Certainly: Yes, I believe Samsung should use the impeccable Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 for their mid-range smartphones, such as the A54. It could potentially make it the best mid-range smartphone of 2023. I hope Samsung considers this processor for their upcoming S23 Fan Edition, offering it at a more affordable price while maintaining the A54's specifications. I would definitely purchase it without hesitation. Thank you.
+2 Reply
EnglishРусский