Exynos 2600 vs Kirin 9030 Pro

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2600 (Samsung Xclipse 960) with the older 9-core HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (Maleoon 935) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2600
  • Has a smaller size transistor (2 versus 5 nm)
  • Performs 2.5x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 83%) AnTuTu 11 score – 3161K vs 1725K
  • 38% higher CPU clock speed (3800 vs 2750 MHz)
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Kirin 9030 Pro
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Has 1 more cores
  • Higher GPU frequency (~5%)
  • Supports 11% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 76.8 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
3161126
1725229
CPU 1023425 515961
GPU 1236436 484107
Memory 384525 431535
UX 516740 293626
Total score 3161126 1725229
Samples [20 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 2600 +138%
3235
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 2600 +111%
10904
Asset compression 459.4 MB/sec 197.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 328.1 pages/sec 169.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 345 Mpixels/sec 168.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 259.1 images/sec 115.1 images/sec
HDR 344.2 Mpixels/sec 166.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 41.7 images/sec 19.3 images/sec
Photo processing 97.1 images/sec 60.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.2 Mpixels/sec 6.14 Mpixels/sec
Samples 8 tests Less than 3
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2600 +236%
27019
Background blur 43.4 images/sec 10.6 images/sec
Face detection 20.2 images/sec 5.64 images/sec
Horizon detection 1.03 Gpixels/sec 0.33 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.41 Gpixels/sec 0.44 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 2.05 Gpixels/sec 0.71 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.28 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 95 Gpixels/sec 36.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 4524 FPS 608.9 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 7 tests Less than 3

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 3109 -
Graphics test 23 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 11935 -
Graphics test 45 FPS -
Section 1 51 FPS -
Section 2 44 FPS -
Section 3 39 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 21279 -
Video editing score 8171 -
Data manipulation score 16909 -
Photo editing score 40764 -
Writing score 30248 -
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2600
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> SerostAnTuTu 123359689
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (gollim)AnTuTu 123269772
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Pires)AnTuTu 123302245
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (Shaco)AnTuTu 123216468
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Artem)AnTuTu 113113554
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2600 and Kirin 9030 Pro

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro
6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro
1x 2.75 GHz – Taishan v124 Big
4x 2.27 GHz – Taishan v124 Mid
4x 1.72 GHz – Taishan v124 Little
Cores 10 9
Frequency 3800 MHz 2750 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache 192 KB -
L2 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Process 2 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W -
Manufacturing Samsung SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 960 Maleoon 935
Architecture RDNA 4 Maleoon
GPU frequency 980 MHz 933 MHz
Pipelines 8 6
Shading units 448 256
Total shaders 1792 1536
FLOPS 7024.6 Gigaflops 2866.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) AI engine with 32K MAC NPU Da Vinci
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 76.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5410 Balong 6000
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 14790 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4900 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2025 November 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9965 -
Official page Samsung Exynos 2600 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
18 (62.1%)
11 (37.9%)
Total votes: 29

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9030 Pro and Exynos 2600, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Emperor September 9, 2026 at 08:08 PM
Kirin 9050 Pro is launched. Please include it's data.
0 Reply
Serhii September 10, 2026 at 09:42 AM
Nice to hear, thank you for a good news :)
+1 Reply
Avatar
hu haw ha January 12, 2026 at 04:37 PM
W8 till the kirin9030pro Big brother come
+2 Reply
Avatar
Sky February 17, 2026 at 10:07 PM
Exactly my friend. Huawei no 1
+3 Reply