Exynos 990 vs Kirin 9000

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 990 (with Mali-G77 MP11 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (Mali-G78 MP24). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 990
  • Higher GPU frequency (~10%)
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9000
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 19%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1079K vs 907K
  • 15% higher CPU clock speed (3130 vs 2730 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
907140
Kirin 9000 +19%
1079281
CPU 370196 370173
GPU 130687 275434
Memory 151878 158011
UX 254379 275663
Total score 907140 1079281
Samples [50 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1222
1262
Multi-Core Score
3060
Kirin 9000 +15%
3507
Asset compression 139.9 MB/sec 146.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 80.6 pages/sec 90.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 99.8 Mpixels/sec 113.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 66.4 images/sec 71.8 images/sec
HDR 98.7 Mpixels/sec 98.9 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.4 images/sec 11.8 images/sec
Photo processing 30.6 images/sec 29.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.92 Mpixels/sec 4.01 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 71 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
5261
Kirin 9000 +44%
7580
Background blur 7.47 images/sec 11.8 images/sec
Face detection 3.84 images/sec 6.39 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.52 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.38 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 15.8 Gpixels/sec 28.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 955.5 FPS 1164.8 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 8 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 391 -
Stability 73% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1416
Kirin 9000 +46%
2062
Score 1416 2062
Stability 65% 90%
Graphics test 8 FPS 12 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 990 +47%
11402
7773
Web score 10705 5096
Video editing score 6884 6152
Data manipulation score 8823 6691
Photo editing score 30928 16500
Writing score 11422 8573
Phones tested 6 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 81 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 44 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 29 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 51 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 58 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Huawei Mate 40 Pro
1344 x 3140
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 990
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (ZailoxTM)AnTuTu 121144833
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Tomio.tomato)AnTuTu 121064880
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SamsungS8HypeAnTuTu 111236527
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (TimFire)AnTuTu 11868691
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (Chryso27)AnTuTu 11815064
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 990 and Kirin 9000

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 3130 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 15.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP11 Mali-G78 MP24
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 832 MHz 759 MHz
Pipelines 11 24
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 352 768
FLOPS 585.7 Gigaflops 1165.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes AI accelerator
NPU theoretical performance 15 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 44 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 4600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2019 October 2020
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9830 -
Official page Samsung Exynos 990 official site HiSilicon Kirin 9000 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
30 (15.1%)
169 (84.9%)
Total votes: 199

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9000 and Exynos 990, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Craig October 24, 2020 at 04:06 PM
I’m assuming these benchmark results were taken whilst the phone was in performance mode?
+7 Reply
root October 24, 2020 at 05:31 PM
Yes, you are correct.
+4 Reply