Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 vs Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
85
out of 100
VS
86
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 12.5-inch Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 (with Xiaomi Xring O1) that was released on June 26, 2025, against the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra, which is powered by the same chip and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Much smaller footprint: 15% more compact case (83.1 vs 98.3 square inches)
- 12% higher pixel density (308 vs 275 PPI)
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
- Has a 1.5 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 1390 mAh larger battery capacity: 12000 vs 10610 mAh
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- OLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
- Thinner bezels – 5.2% more screen real estate
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED |
| Size | 12.5 inches | 14 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 2136 x 3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| PPI | 308 ppi | 275 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1000 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 92% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 97.9% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 30 ms | - |
| Contrast | 3415:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad 7 Ultra
14″ (3:2 ratio) = 90.5 in2
Pad 7S Pro 12.5
12.5″ (3:2 ratio) = 72.1 in2
~25% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 279.1 mm (10.99 inches) | 305.82 mm (12.04 inches) |
| Width | 192 mm (7.56 inches) | 207.47 mm (8.17 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.8 mm (0.23 inches) | 5.1 mm (0.2 inches) |
| Weight | 576 g (20.32 oz) | 609 g (21.48 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Gray, Purple | Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 536 cm2 (83.1 inches2) | 634 cm2 (98.4 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (21st and 16th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (16th and 12th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Xiaomi Xring O1 | Xiaomi Xring O1 |
| Max clock | 3400 MHz | 3700 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) | 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 4 cores at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 2 cores at 3.9 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 4 cores at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 2 cores at 3.9 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 | Immortalis-G925 MP16 |
| GPU shading units | 2048 | 2048 |
| GPU clock | 1392 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5701.6 GFLOPS | ~5701.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 21512 | 20977 |
| Single-core score | 2746 | 2737 |
| Multi-core score | 8431 | 9191 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 937172 | 937172 |
| GPU | 996086 | 996086 |
| Memory | 409648 | 409648 |
| UX | 620146 | 620146 |
| Total score | 2963052 | 2963052 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [2 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 92% | 93% |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | 19 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2413 | 2510 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 34 FPS | 37 FPS |
| Section 1 | 37 FPS | 39 FPS |
| Section 2 | 35 FPS | 38 FPS |
| Section 3 | 31 FPS | 34 FPS |
| Graphics score | 9022 | 9767 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17566 | 19150 |
| Video editing | 6957 | 7129 |
| Photo editing | 27481 | 29727 |
| Data manipulation | 15048 | 18881 |
| Writing score | 19142 | 21285 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-06-28 (Satoru_Goatjo) | AnTuTu 11 | 2842416 |
| 📘 2026-04-09 (Albert) | CPU Throttle | 92% |
| 📘 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 21512 |
| 📘 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2746 / 8431 |
| 📘 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | AnTuTu 11 | 2963052 |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
| OS size | 31 GB | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 10610 mAh | 12000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 120 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Web browsing | 14:06 hr | - |
| Watching video | 21:34 hr | - |
| Gaming | 09:10 hr | - |
| Standby | 169 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | Omnivision OV32D |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | 0.61 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | June 2025 | May 2025 |
| Release date | June 2025 | May 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $460 | - |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Yes, 120 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 7 Ultra:
- The Nano Soft screen model is 10g heavier.
- NFC is supported for data transfer only.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the display is more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra. But if the battery life and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 27