Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro vs Lenovo Idea Tab Plus
66
out of 100
VS
60
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4) that was released on September 24, 2025, against the Lenovo Idea Tab Plus, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 6400 . On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
- 90% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (986K versus 519K)
- Comes with 1800 mAh larger battery capacity: 12000 vs 10200 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
- Reverse charging feature
- 62% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1239 and 764 points
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Lenovo Idea Tab Plus
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- Delivers 15% higher peak brightness (629 against 548 nits)
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 33W)
- Weighs 80 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 inches | 12.1 inches |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 249 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | - |
| Max rated brightness | - | 800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 650 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | 84.1% |
| Display features | - | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 96.6% | 134.4% |
| PWM | Not detected | Not detected |
| Response time | 28 ms | 23 ms |
| Contrast | 1764:1 | 1296:1 |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 279.8 mm (11.02 inches) | 278.8 mm (10.98 inches) |
| Width | 181.7 mm (7.15 inches) | 181.05 mm (7.13 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) | 6.29 mm (0.25 inches) |
| Weight | 610 g (21.52 oz) | 530 g (18.69 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP52 |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Gray, Purple | Gray, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 508 cm2 (78.8 inches2) | 505 cm2 (78.3 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | Excellent (4.05/5) |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) · 208 drops | Bad (E) · 5 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (80th and 94th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (61st and 70th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 |
| Max clock | 2700 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| L3 cache | - | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 810 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 64 |
| GPU clock | 895 MHz | 1072 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~458.2 GFLOPS | ~137.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 4784 | 1240 |
| Single-core score | 1239 | 764 |
| Multi-core score | 3286 | 2021 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 380886 | 215919 |
| GPU | 190421 | 47513 |
| Memory | 139368 | 109180 |
| UX | 276207 | 147129 |
| Total score | 986882 | 519771 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [2 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | - | 1 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 138 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 15292 |
| Video editing | - | 6125 |
| Photo editing | - | 25011 |
| Data manipulation | - | 7802 |
| Writing score | - | 14566 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-04-03 (Deepa) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 4784 |
| 📘 2026-04-03 (Deepa) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1239 / 3286 |
| 📘 2026-04-03 (Deepa) | AnTuTu 11 | 986882 |
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | Up to 2048 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | - |
| OS size | 34 GB | 28 GB |
| OS updates | 0 years | 0 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 12000 mAh | 10200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 33 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (30% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 40 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:20 hr | 1:27 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 08:13 hr | - |
| Watching video | 11:17 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:52 hr | - |
| Standby | 233 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | - | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2025 | September 2025 |
| Release date | September 2025 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $229 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Hall-effect sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 33 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1