Intel Core i5 13400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 7600

54 out of 100
Intel Core i5 13400F
VS
60 out of 100
AMD Ryzen 5 7600

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2.5 GHz Intel Core i5 13400F with 10-cores against the 3.8 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 7600 with 6-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the DeviceFacts Score for desktop CPU.
DeviceFacts Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click β€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
58.9
(Average)
Value Index
88.4
(Very good)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 7600 and 13400F
Advantages of Intel Core i5 13400F
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • Supports up to 192 GB DDR5-4800 RAM
  • Around 3.4 GB/s (5%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
  • More modern manufacturing process – 5 versus 10 nanometers
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Has 12 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • 16% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2797 vs 2409 points
  • Includes an integrated GPU Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
  • 13% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.1 GHz vs 4.5 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 551 597
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 3442 3144

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2797
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
12486
File compression 842.6 MB/sec 1280 MB/sec
Clang compilation 88.9 Klines/sec 89.8 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 264.3 pages/sec 271.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 348.3 Mpixels/sec 313.1 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 237.2 pages/sec 281.5 pages/sec
Background blur 54.8 images/sec 55.7 images/sec
Photo processing 88.3 images/sec 89.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 20.1 Mpixels/sec 16.4 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 805 & 788 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
26969
Integer math 80 GOps/sec 80.2 GOps/sec
Floating point math 60.5 GOps/sec 48 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 81M Primes/sec 198M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 32.1M Strings/sec 36.2M Strings/sec
Data encryption 16.6 GBytes/sec 17.6 GBytes/sec
Data compression 310.5 MBytes/sec 303.8 MBytes/sec
Physics 1408 Frames/sec 1750 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 19.8B Matrices/sec 23B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 5089 & 6830 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 12.5 PPW 11.6 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 174.2 PPW 192.1 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 383 PPW 414.9 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.09 PPW 3.09 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i5 13400F
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-07 (Andre)Cinebench 2026551 / 3442
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-14 (Kashitsu)Cinebench 2024103 / 874
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-09 (Andy)Geekbench 6 CPU2467 / 11248
πŸ“˜ 2024-11-04 (Shinigami1Ryuk)Cinebench 2024101 / 814
πŸ“˜ 2024-10-02 (SigmaKlein)Cinebench 2024100 / 821
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 (appiar)Cinebench 2026582 / 3131
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-22 -> Lello75Cinebench 2026611 / 3435
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-27 -> Lello75Geekbench 6 CPU2856 / 13297
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-27 (Parrott)Cinebench 2026597 / 3144
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-16 -> Lello75Geekbench 6 CPU2859 / 13080

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 13400F and AMD Ryzen 5 7600

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released January 3, 2023 January 10, 2023
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Raptor Lake Zen 4 (Raphael)
Model number i5-13400F -
Integrated GPU No Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 5 7500F - Intel Core i5 13600
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 5 225F -
Intel CPU rating (#123rd place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#67th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 6
P-Threads 12 12
Base Frequency (P) 2.5 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.5 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 4 -
E-Threads 4 -
Base Frequency (E) 1.8 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.4 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 10 6
Total Threads 16 12
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 25x 38x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 1280K (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 20MB (shared) 32MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No Yes

Package

Transistors - 6.57 billions
Fabrication Process 10 nm 5 nm
TDP (PL1) 65 W 65 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 148 W 88 W
Socket LGA-1700 AM5
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 95Β°C
Desktop CPU ranking (92nd and 79th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics - Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
GPU Base Clock - 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock - 2200 MHz
Shading Units - 128
TMUs - 8
ROPs - 4
Execution Units - 2
TGP - 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
0.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-4800
- DDR4-3200
- DDR5-5200
Max. Memory Size 192 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 76.8 GB/s 73.4 GB/s
ECC Support No Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i5 13400F official page AMD Ryzen 5 7600 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
33 (23.6%)
107 (76.4%)
Total votes: 140

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 or Intel Core i5 13400F?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
asfdgs August 29, 2024 at 02:41 AM
looks like 22% of voters enjoy bluescreens on their 13th gen ;)
+4 Reply