Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ultra 7 258V

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.3 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 185H with 16-cores against the 2.2 GHz Ultra 7 258V with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
DeviceFacts Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 258V and 185H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  • Supports up to 96 GB LPDDR5-7467 RAM
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • Has 12 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • More powerful Arc Graphics (8-Cores) integrated graphics: 4.8 vs 4 TFLOPS
  • More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
  • 6% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.1 GHz vs 4.8 GHz)
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 7 nanometers
  • Newer - released 9 months later
  • 12% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2745 vs 2446 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (#156th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1270 MB/sec 1020 MB/sec
Clang compilation 102.8 Klines/sec 66.1 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 342.7 pages/sec 287.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 389.7 Mpixels/sec 295.6 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 245.1 pages/sec 276.7 pages/sec
Background blur 45.2 images/sec 46.5 images/sec
Photo processing 131.5 images/sec 113.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 23.3 Mpixels/sec 14 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 492 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 97.4 GOps/sec 42.9 GOps/sec
Floating point math 72.2 GOps/sec 57.4 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 123M Primes/sec 185M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 39M Strings/sec 21.6M Strings/sec
Data encryption 19.5 GBytes/sec 13.5 GBytes/sec
Data compression 334.6 MBytes/sec 176.6 MBytes/sec
Physics 1940 Frames/sec 1565 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 19.9B Matrices/sec 14.7B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 4148 & 2133 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 15.2 PPW 17.2 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 209.4 PPW 291.9 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 446.1 PPW 510.4 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.08 PPW 3.48 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-28 (Nicholas)Cinebench 202492 / 795
πŸ“˜ 2024-12-29 (Remembered2U)Cinebench 2024107 / 987
πŸ“˜ 2024-11-03 (Anish)Cinebench 2024103 / 886
πŸ“˜ 2024-10-01 (Guest #3)Cinebench 2024108 / 1088
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (THINKPAD T16 GEN4)Cinebench 2024122 / 584
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-06 (Matty)Cinebench 2024113 / 512
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekbench 6 CPU2869 / 11446

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Ultra 7 258V

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released December 14, 2023 September 4, 2024
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Meteor Lake Lunar Lake
Model number 185H 258V
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (8-Cores) Arc Graphics 140V
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS -
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 9 288V -
Intel CPU rating (83rd and 88th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 4
P-Threads 12 4
Base Frequency (P) 2.3 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.1 GHz 4.8 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 4
E-Threads 10 4
Base Frequency (E) 1.8 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.8 GHz 3.7 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 8
Total Threads 22 8
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 23x 22x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 2560K (per core)
L3 Cache 24MB (shared) 12MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 7 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 35-65 W (configurable) 17-37 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 115 W -
Socket FCBGA-2049 FCBGA-2833
Peak Temperature 110Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (103rd and 111th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (8-Cores) Intel Arc Graphics 140V
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 600 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2350 MHz 1950 MHz
Shading Units 1024 1024
TMUs 64 -
ROPs 32 -
Execution Units 128 -
TGP 28 W 30 W
iGPU FLOPS
4.8 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-7467
- LPDDR5x-7467
- DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5X-8533
Max. Memory Size 96 GB 32 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 185H official page Intel Core Ultra 7 258V official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 28 8

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
41 (68.3%)
19 (31.7%)
Total votes: 60

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V or Ultra 9 185H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!