Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada vs GeForce RTX 3050
VS
Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada
AD107
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
GA106
We compared two discrete desktop graphics cards: the Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada 16 GB with 22 pipelines and 2816 shaders against the GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB that utilizes 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
DeviceFacts Final Score
Overall video card score
Value for money (Beta)
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada
- Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
- 32% higher maximum theoretical performance (12 vs 9.1 TFLOPS)
- Includes 8 GB more video memory
- Supports Nvidia DLSS 3 technology
- Achieves 34% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (89K vs 67K)
Gaming Performance
Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutionsGames
| Forza Horizon 5 | - | 92 53 43 26 |
| The Witcher 3 | - | 90 70 49 24 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | - | 139 101 72 31 |
| Far Cry 6 | - | 76 66 49 25 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | - | 49 38 30 13 |
| CoD: Modern Warfare III | - | 59 49 35 22 |
| Ghost of Tsushima | - | 46 35 28 15 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | - | 48 45 26 11 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | - | 80 73 49 25 |
| 1080p High | - | 75 |
| 1080p Ultra | - | 59 |
| 1440p Ultra | - | 42 |
| 4K Ultra | - | 21 |
| Margin of Error | High | Low |
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | - | 6235 |
| Solar Bay | - | 30191 |
| Port Royal | - | 3546 |
| Fire Strike | - | 15967 |
| Wild Life Extreme | - | 12795 |
| Night Raid | - | 74854 |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 170.5 img/sec | 110.4 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 102.8 img/sec | 64.4 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 3.25 Gpixels/sec | 2.87 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 4.12 Gpixels/sec | 3.76 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 4.06 Gpixels/sec | 2.89 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.13 Gpixels/sec | 0.81 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 353.4 Gpixels/sec | 270.9 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 12273.1 FPS | 9339.7 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
Cinebench 2024 GPU
Cinebench 2024 GPU
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 1073 | 916 |
| DirectX 11 | 138 FPS | 90 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 71 FPS | 59 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 7810 Ops/s | 6415 Ops/s |
Blender
Blender GPU
Recent User Tests
Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada
No benchmark results yet
GeForce RTX 3050
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-04-21 -> DmitryDmitry | Cinebench 2024 | 4722 |
| 📘 2026-04-21 -> DmitryDmitry | Steel Nomad Light | 6237 |
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | 6382 | 4958 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 16489 | 12747 |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | 17694 | 9816 |
| Face Detection (HP) | 32453 | 22467 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 56937 | 41362 |
| Text Classification (SP) | 3097 | 2563 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 4324 | 3721 |
| Object Detection (SP) | 7656 | 5929 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 29700 | 18361 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 116441 | 84665 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
Specifications
Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada and GeForce RTX 3050General
| Vendor | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Released | February 12, 2022 | January 27, 2022 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $249 |
| Case | Desktop | Desktop |
| Purpose | Professional | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| GPU Codename | AD107 | GA106 |
| Recommended CPU | - Intel Core i7 14700K or above | - Intel Core i5 12400 or above |
Desktop GPU rating (46th and 71st place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 1620 MHz | 1552 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 2560 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 88 | 80 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 48 | 32 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 22 | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 88 | 80 |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 22 | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 128KB per cluster | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | 12MB shared | 2MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 102 GPixel/s | 57 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 187 GTexel/s | 142 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| TGP | 70 W | 130 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Fabrication Process | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Die Size | 159 mm² | 276 mm² |
| Transistor Count | 18 billion | 12 billion |
| Transistor Density | 113.21 MTr/mm² | 43.48 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed | 16000 Mbps | 14000 Mbps |
| Bus | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| ECC | No | No |
Memory Bandwidth
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 3 | DLSS 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | 1.4a |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2