Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada vs GeForce RTX 3060

We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada 20 GB with 48 pipelines and 6144 shaders against the 2 years and 7 months older GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB that utilizes 28 pipelines and 3584 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
DeviceFacts Final Score
Overall video card score

Value for money (Beta)

We use average GPU prices from all manufacturers by default. Enter the current price of a specific card for better accuracy.
Currency
20 GB GDDR6
VS
12 GB GDDR6
8.8
(Bad)
Value Index
49.1
(Average)

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 3060 over RTX 4000 Ada
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada
  • Performs significantly better (up to 63%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 2.1x higher maximum theoretical performance (26.7 vs 12.7 TFLOPS)
  • Shows 53% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 92 vs 60 FPS
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
149
98
91
63
112
68
60
39
The Witcher 3
177
143
103
54
122
100
74
39
Counter-Strike 2
253
201
135
80
181
137
99
48
Far Cry 6
131
123
101
58
95
85
67
37
Hogwarts Legacy
102
82
66
34
65
57
40
18
CoD: Modern Warfare III
126
119
88
56
80
74
53
31
Ghost of Tsushima
94
79
61
33
62
50
37
20
Cyberpunk 2077
112
96
64
30
68
64
38
16
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
175
157
119
65
109
98
70
36
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 147 99
1080p Ultra 122 81
1440p Ultra 92 60
4K Ultra 53 32
Margin of Error High Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
14674
9001
Time Spy 14438 8754
Solar Bay 65875 41158
Port Royal 8974 5145
Fire Strike 37396 22304
Wild Life Extreme - 17728
Night Raid 158480 97159
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
151680
91603
Background Blur 235.3 img/sec 149.6 img/sec
Face Detection 157.9 img/sec 91 img/sec
Horizon Detection 5.53 Gpixels/sec 4.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 7.44 Gpixels/sec 5.58 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 7.87 Gpixels/sec 3.92 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.58 Gpixels/sec 1.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 737.7 Gpixels/sec 372.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 22409.2 FPS 12226.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
23646
16710
G2D Mark 1110 965
DirectX 11 203 FPS 127 FPS
DirectX 12 93 FPS 68 FPS
GPU Compute 11869 Ops/s 8231 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 1138 & 46248 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
4447.56
2288.28
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 70 & 6537 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada
No benchmark results yet
GeForce RTX 3060
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-12-07 (tach)Cinebench 20247952

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
22372
15123
GB6 ML Half Precision
35651
25942
GB6 ML Quantized
17081
10356
Image Classification (SP) 9717 6645
Image Segmentation (HP) 19365 15338
Image Super Resolution (Q) 29227 14283
Face Detection (HP) 40416 28862
Pose Estimation (Q) 105639 61313
Text Classification (SP) 3577 2463
Machine Translation (HP) 4193 3793
Object Detection (SP) 10820 7712
Depth Estimation (Q) 36574 25461
Style Transfer (SP) 200936 123233
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada and GeForce RTX 3060

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released August 9, 2023 January 12, 2021
Launch price (MSRP) $1250 $329
Case Desktop Desktop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment High-end Mid-range
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ampere
GPU Codename AD104 GA106
Rival Equivalent - - Radeon RX 6700 XT
Successor - - GeForce RTX 5060
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i7 14700K or above - Intel Core i5 12600K or above
Desktop GPU rating (36th and 58th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1500 MHz 1320 MHz
Boost Clock 2175 MHz 1777 MHz
Shading Units 6144 3584
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 192 112
Render Output Units (ROPs) 80 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) 48 28
Tensor Cores 192 112
Ray-tracing Cores 48 28
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 48MB shared 3MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 174 GPixel/s 85 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 418 GTexel/s 199 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
RTX 4000 Ada +110%
26.7 TFLOPS
12.7 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 130 W 170 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Fabrication Process 5 nm 8 nm
Die Size 294 mm² 276 mm²
Transistor Count 35 billion 12 billion
Transistor Density 119.05 MTr/mm² 43.48 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 20 GB 12 GB
Memory Clock 2250 MHz 1875 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 18000 Mbps 15000 Mbps
Bus 160-bit 192-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
360 GB/s
360 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 8.9 8.6
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 3 DLSS 2
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!