AMD Radeon 680M vs Adreno X1-85
VS
AMD Radeon 680M
Rembrandt
Adreno X1-85
Adreno X1
We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 680M with 12 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 1 year and 10 months newer Adreno X1-85 that utilizes 6 pipelines and 1536 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
DeviceFacts Final Score
Overall video card score
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Radeon 680M
- Ray-tracing support with 12 dedicated RT cores
Reasons to consider the Adreno X1-85
- Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
- 24% higher maximum theoretical performance (4.6 vs 3.7 TFLOPS)
- Has 2x more shading units (1536 vs 768)
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 2327 | 1695 |
| Solar Bay | 9712 | 10596 |
| Port Royal | 1008 | - |
| Fire Strike | 6903 | 6134 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 4163 | 6152 |
| Night Raid | 27534 | 28868 |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 73.8 img/sec | 36.4 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 30.1 img/sec | 17.3 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 0.93 Gpixels/sec | 1.19 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 1.17 Gpixels/sec | 1.3 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.17 Gpixels/sec | 1.42 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.37 Gpixels/sec | 0.3 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 105 Gpixels/sec | 72.4 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 4640 FPS | 4692.5 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 723 | 518 |
| DirectX 11 | 40 FPS | 19 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 21 FPS | 10 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 2006 Ops/s | 1958 Ops/s |
Recent User Tests
Radeon 680M
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-12-08 (Wahyu) | Geekbench 6 OpenCL | 26880 |
Adreno X1-85
No benchmark results yet
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | 1976 | 1347 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 3138 | 2661 |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | 6693 | 3084 |
| Face Detection (HP) | 7213 | 5354 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 21849 | 7719 |
| Text Classification (SP) | 1497 | 292 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 2579 | 1108 |
| Object Detection (SP) | 2154 | 660 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 9635 | 3876 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 56269 | 12048 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
Specifications
Technical specifications of Radeon 680M and Adreno X1-85General
| Vendor | Amd | Qualcomm |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Released | January 1, 2022 | October 24, 2023 |
| Case | Laptop | Laptop |
| Purpose | Generic | Generic |
| Segment | Entry-level | Entry-level |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Adreno X1 |
| GPU Codename | Rembrandt | Adreno X1 |
| Rival Equivalent | - Radeon RX Vega 8 | - Apple M4 GPU (10-Core) |
| Successor | - Radeon 8050S | - Adreno X2-90 |
| Recommended CPU | - AMD Ryzen 7 6800H or above | - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) or above |
| Used in CPUs | - AMD Ryzen 7 170 - AMD Ryzen 7 7735U - AMD Ryzen 7 7736U - AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS - AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U - AMD Ryzen 7 6800U - AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS - AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS - and 2 more |
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-66-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-78-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-80-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) |
Laptop GPU ranking (104th and 113th place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 400 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2200-2400 MHz (configurable) | 1200-1500 MHz (configurable) |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 48 | 96 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 32 | 48 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 12 | 6 |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 12 | No |
| L1 Cache | 128KB per cluster | 192KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | 2MB shared | 1MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 70-77 GPixel/s | 58-72 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 106-115 GTexel/s | 115-144 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |
| TGP | 15 W | 30 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Fabrication Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Die Size | 208 mm² | - |
| Transistor Count | 13.1 billion | - |
| Transistor Density | 62.98 MTr/mm² | - |
Memory
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| ECC | No | - |
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | - | No |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
| DisplayPort | - | 1.4 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 4
Related comparisons
5.
Radeon 680M vs Radeon 780M (2)