Oppo Find X5 Pro vs X2 Pro
64
out of 100
VS
59
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.7-inch Oppo Find X5 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1) that was released on February 24, 2022, against the Oppo Find X2 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 and came out 2 years before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Shows 10% longer battery life (19:51 vs 18:02 hours)
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
- Comes with 740 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4260 mAh
- 22% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1210K versus 992K)
- More recent OS version: Android 14 versus 13
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 65W)
- The phone is 2 years newer
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X2 Pro
- The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Delivers 15% higher peak brightness (876 against 763 nits)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3216 pixels | 1440 x 3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.8:9 |
| PPI | 525 ppi | 513 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1300 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 88.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 98.1% | 100% |
| PWM | 361 Hz | 480 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 2.6 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.7 mm (6.44 inches) | 165.2 mm (6.5 inches) |
| Width | 73.9 mm (2.91 inches) | 74.4 mm (2.93 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.8 mm (0.35 inches) |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 207 g (7.3 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Blue | Black, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 |
| Max clock | 3000 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X2 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) - 1 core at 2.84 GHz: Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon 698 |
| Graphics | Adreno 730 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 818 MHz | 587 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1675.3 GFLOPS | ~901.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 2987 |
| Single-core score | 1447 | 1156 |
| Multi-core score | 3778 | 2744 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 372775 | 359802 |
| GPU | 367844 | 170732 |
| Memory | 152243 | 206466 |
| UX | 317793 | 255401 |
| Total score | 1210655 | 992401 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [2 tests] |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 63% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 15 FPS | 6 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2555 | 1110 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10084 | 8423 |
| Video editing | 5934 | 5846 |
| Photo editing | 24107 | 28705 |
| Data manipulation | 9990 | 8390 |
| Writing score | 17026 | 14503 |
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X5 Pro
No benchmark results yet
Oppo Find X2 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-03 -> penguin_1234 | Geekbench 6 GPU | 3056 |
| 📘 2026-08-03 -> penguin_1234 | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1129 / 3155 |
| 📘 2026-08-03 -> penguin_1234 | AnTuTu 11 | 992401 |
| 📘 2026-04-20 (DQ) | CPU Throttle | 95% |
| 📘 2026-03-02 (DQ) | AnTuTu 11 | 969485 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 3200 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 12.1 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) | Android 10.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) |
| ROM | ColorOS 12.1 | ColorOS 13.1 |
| OS size | 24.1 GB | 53 GB |
| OS updates | 3 years | - |
| Security updates | 4 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 4260 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 65 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (91% in 30 min) | Yes, SuperVOOC 2.0 Flash Charge (100% in 40 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:40 hr | 0:40 hr |
| Web browsing | 08:01 hr | 06:49 hr |
| Watching video | 13:05 hr | 10:55 hr |
| Gaming | 05:30 hr | 04:44 hr |
| Standby | 88 hr | 89 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 48 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8700 x 5800 | 8000 x 6000 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | 960 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 110° | 120° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 13 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 48 MP 2) Telephoto: 13 MP 3) Ultrawide: 48 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | Sony IMX689 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.43" (≈ 0.7 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/3.0 |
| Focal length | 52 mm | 129 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3M5 | Samsung S5K3M5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.4" (≈ 0.29 inch) | 1/3.4" (≈ 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 17 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | Sony IMX586 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 65 | - |
| Preview | 70 | - |
| Zoom | 127 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Oppo Find X5 Pro from DxOMark | Photo samples of Oppo Find X2 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6560 x 4928 | 6464 x 4864 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX709 | Sony IMX616 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
DxOMark front camera
| Photo | 119 | 87 |
| Video | 113 | 114 |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | - |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | February 2022 | March 2020 |
| Release date | March 2022 | April 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1390 | $1320 |
| Successor | - | - Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | - |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Oppo Find X5 Pro. It has a better performance, gaming, battery life, connectivity, and software.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 75