Home > Smartphone comparison > Vivo X200T vs Reno 15 Pro Mini – which one to choose?

Vivo X200T vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini

84 out of 100
Vivo X200T
VS
80 out of 100
Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini
Vivo X200T
Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Vivo X200T (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus) that was released on January 27, 2026, against the Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8450. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments (3)

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200T
  • Has a 0.35 inch larger screen size
  • 34% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2725K versus 2031K)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
  • 70% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2729 and 1606 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
  • Weighs 18 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200T and Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
DeviceFacts Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate DeviceFacts Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
71.4
(Good)
Value Index
61.7
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Vivo X200T
vs
Reno 15 Pro Mini

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.32 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1216 x 2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 460 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5000 nits 3600 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate - 240 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 89.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Screen space comparison
Vivo X200T
6.67β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 16.6 in2
Reno 15 Pro Mini
6.32β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.2 in2
~9% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)

Design and build

Height 160.01 mm (6.3 inches) 151.2 mm (5.95 inches)
Width 74.29 mm (2.92 inches) 72.4 mm (2.85 inches)
Thickness 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 205 g (7.23 oz) 187 g (6.6 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Purple White, Brown
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200T +1%
90.3%
Reno 15 Pro Mini
89.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200T and Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus MediaTek Dimensity 8450
Max clock 3730 MHz 3250 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925		 - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725
L3 cache 12 MB 6 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 MediaTek NPU 880
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G720 MP7
GPU shading units 1536 896
GPU clock 1612 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200T and Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200T +70%
2729
Reno 15 Pro Mini
1606
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200T +34%
8430
Reno 15 Pro Mini
6287
Compute Score (GPU)
Vivo X200T +78%
21754
Reno 15 Pro Mini
12250
Compute Score (GPU) 21754 12250
Single-core score 2729 1606
Multi-core score 8430 6287
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X200T +34%
2725989
Reno 15 Pro Mini
2031580
CPU 800906 640814
GPU 988549 629065
Memory 371345 284194
UX 565189 477507
Total score 2725989 2031580
Samples [6 tests] Less than 3
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#138th place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200T
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (Anand)AnTuTu 122939313
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (GTALVG)AnTuTu 112594807
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-05 (Sachin)AnTuTu 112688395
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-19 (Sagark)AnTuTu 112472407
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-14 (adi)Geekbench 6 CPU2729 / 8430
Add View all (8)
Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-29 (Peanut)AnTuTu 112031580
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-05 (Peanut)CPU Throttle46%
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Peanut)Geekbench 6 CPU1606 / 6287
Add View all (3)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 4266 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM OriginOS 6 ColorOS 16
OS updates 5 years -

Battery

Capacity 6200 mAh 6200 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (70% in 30 min) Yes (62% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:54 hr 0:54 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 11:56 hr
Watching video - 21:44 hr
Gaming - 07:29 hr
Standby - 127 hr
General battery life
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 480 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 100Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony IMX921 -
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.5 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.8
Focal length 70 mm 85 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) -
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Samsung JD1 -
Sensor size 1/3.14" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 18 mm
Sensor Samsung KD1 -
Sensor size 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Depends on the region
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - No

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced January 2026 January 2026
Release date February 2026 January 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $650 $670
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, connectivity, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X200T. But if the camera is more of a priority – go for the Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
8 (80%)
2 (20%)
Total votes: 10

Related comparisons

1. Vivo X200T vs Vivo X300
2. Vivo X200T vs Vivo iQOO 15
3. Vivo X200T vs Vivo X200 FE
4. Vivo X200T vs OnePlus 15R
5. Vivo X200T vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
6. Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini vs Realme GT 7T
7. Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini vs Huawei Nova 15 Ultra
8. Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini vs OnePlus 15R
9. Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
10. Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini vs Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
jameel January 29, 2026 at 05:42 AM
reno 15 pro minis bsttery is just 300 Mah large than X200Ts Battey but the Statics of your website Shows 13 percent better the cameras are almost identical I think X200T superior in all categories
0 Reply
Avatar
Serhii January 30, 2026 at 08:14 AM
Not in all but phone is nice. Thank you for a comment.
0 Reply
Avatar
Favi12 January 31, 2026 at 12:57 AM
This website is bias and against vivo products the vivo have a superior camera spec just that the oppo takes higher resolution photos with it 200mp camera but regardless the vivo have a better camera but somehow vivo got 81 overall.
0 Reply
EnglishРусский