Dimensity 8300 vs A15 Bionic

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (Mali-G615 MP6) with the older 6-core Apple A15 Bionic (Apple A15 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Performs 26% better in floating-point computations
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Shows better (up to 14%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1604K vs 1413K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~5%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1604305
1413275
CPU 482670 410975
GPU 432750 370837
Memory 299238 164151
UX 389647 467312
Total score 1604305 1413275
Samples [103 tests] [69 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect DeviceFacts scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A15 Bionic +68%
2315
Multi-Core Score
A15 Bionic +36%
5753
Asset compression 174.4 MB/sec 208.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 128.6 pages/sec 122.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 146.7 Mpixels/sec 139.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 93.5 images/sec 125.1 images/sec
HDR 136.1 Mpixels/sec 179.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.2 images/sec 22.3 images/sec
Photo processing 37.6 images/sec 53.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.97 Mpixels/sec 6.26 Mpixels/sec
Samples 50 tests 37 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A15 Bionic +297%
20400
Background blur 16.5 images/sec 35.4 images/sec
Face detection 9.4 images/sec 44.8 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.62 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.63 Gpixels/sec 0.82 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.46 Gpixels/sec 0.84 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.7 Gpixels/sec 71.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1671.3 FPS 2198.2 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 27 tests 19 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 881 -
Stability 77% -
Graphics test 7 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
3765
Score 3688 3765
Stability - 71%
Graphics test 14 FPS 14 FPS
Section 1 16 FPS 19 FPS
Section 2 14 FPS 14 FPS
Section 3 12 FPS 9 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
2854
Score 2768 2854
Stability - 76%
Graphics test 16 FPS 17 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14649 -
Video editing score 6419 -
Data manipulation score 12555 -
Photo editing score 23328 -
Writing score 18403 -
Phones tested 2 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 -> rajeshwarshah-Oct2AnTuTu 111450232
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Putrz)AnTuTu 111440126
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 -> uravinqAnTuTu 121745585
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Michael Cheng)AnTuTu 121933824
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (MΓΌller)AnTuTu 121893547
Apple A15 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 -> HotPowerGeekbench 7 CPU2155 / 5548
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (Hoz4ik)AnTuTu 111127460
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 -> op1Geekbench 6 CPU2168 / 4988
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> HotPowerAnTuTu 111184759
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> HotPowerGeekbench 6 GPU21284

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8300 and A15 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
2x 3.23 GHz – Avalanche
4x 2.02 GHz – Blizzard
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3350 MHz 3230 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache - 12 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 15 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G615 MP6 Apple A15 GPU
Architecture Valhall 4rd gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1400 MHz 1338 MHz
Pipelines 6 5
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 768 640
FLOPS 2150.4 Gigaflops 1712.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 780 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 15.8 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek T800 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 3000 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced November 2023 September 2021
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number MT6897 APL1W07
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8300 official site -
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 8400 - Apple A19 Pro
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8300:
    - Dimensity 8300 Ultra is identical to the Dimensity 8300 (without "Ultra") regarding technical specifications and performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
772 (74.7%)
261 (25.3%)
Total votes: 1033

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A15 Bionic and Dimensity 8300, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!
Avatar
Dimensity Menace! March 23, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Damn now this is what I call impressive
0 Reply
Avatar
Unn February 3, 2024 at 05:00 AM
I am eagerly awaiting Vivo's creation of a phone powered by Dimensity 8300 to rival the Bionic A15 or iPhone 13 Pro Max. I believe Vivo is the only brand capable of competing with Samsung and Apple in terms of camera optimization. They are the only active BBK brand that sells smartphones with smooth camera features.
+23 Reply
Avatar
Unn November 22, 2023 at 01:06 PM
The Dimensity 8300 and 7+Gen2 should be considered flagship ranges instead of mid-range. I think the reason they're classified as mid-range is because they aren't used as extensively. In contrast, the Dimensity 8100, 8200, and the 855-888+ series are categorized as flagship due to their extensive usage.
+17 Reply
Avatar
101dude December 28, 2023 at 08:51 PM
That's not the case. The SD 855-888 were designed for flagship devices from 2019-2021. Who would pay top dollar for a phone with a seventh-plus-gen model 2 or 8300 in 2024 when there are better chips available, like the A17 Pro, SD 8 Gen3, and Dimensity 9300? It's simply a result of technological advancement, as it always has been.
+17 Reply
Avatar
Azathoth13 June 6, 2024 at 01:11 PM
101dude, Mate the 8300 is a budget friendly I can buy a phone with 280 USD with 8300 but now you saying 799 dollar or Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra with that 8 gen 3 they are far expensive
+10 Reply
Avatar
Budget October 2, 2024 at 05:06 AM
Azathoth13, A budget-friendly flagship phone is impossible. You can get cheaper phones with flagship chipset, like Xiaomi K70 Pro and Xiaomi K70 Ultra. But they not really flagship phones because its other major features are not flagship.
+4 Reply