Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Kirin 659

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus (with Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 659 (Mali-T830 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
DeviceFacts Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
  • Performs 86x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 16 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~79%)
  • 58% higher CPU clock speed (3730 vs 2360 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 869347 -
GPU 1015558 -
Memory 357663 -
UX 632388 -
Total score 2874956 -
Samples [171 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2729
214
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 359.5 MB/sec 62.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 252.5 pages/sec 27.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 300.4 Mpixels/sec 39 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 223.1 images/sec 10 images/sec
HDR 267.2 Mpixels/sec 26.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 33.2 images/sec 0.84 images/sec
Photo processing 78.2 images/sec 6.86 images/sec
Ray tracing 9.25 Mpixels/sec 1.71 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 5 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 49 images/sec -
Face detection 28.1 images/sec -
Horizon detection 0.94 Gpixels/sec -
Edge detection 1.21 Gpixels/sec -
Gaussian blur 1.5 Gpixels/sec -
Feature matching 0.34 Gpixels/sec -
Stereo matching 72.5 Gpixels/sec -
Particle physics 3826.1 FPS -
API Vulkan -
Samples 17 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 2377 -
Stability 77% -
Graphics test 18 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 10715 -
Graphics test 41 FPS -
Section 1 45 FPS -
Section 2 41 FPS -
Section 3 36 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 5777 -
Graphics test 34 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 12340 -
Video editing score 7385 -
Data manipulation score 14039 -
Photo editing score 40750 -
Writing score 27541 -
Phones tested 10 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-10 (KhΓ‘nh)AnTuTu 122949218
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-08 -> AIMAN PUTRAAnTuTu 123156788
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (CherePavel)AnTuTu 123215890
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (JJ)AnTuTu 121116490
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (Anand)AnTuTu 122939313
HiSilicon Kirin 659
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9400 Plus and Kirin 659

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.73 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3730 MHz 2360 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache 128 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB -
L3 cache 12 MB -
Process 3 nanometers 16 nanometers
Transistor count - 4 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W -
Manufacturing TSMC -

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Mali-T830 MP2
Architecture Valhall 5th gen Midgard 4th gen
GPU frequency 1612 MHz 900 MHz
Pipelines 12 2
Shading units 128 16
Total shaders 1536 32
FLOPS 4952.1 Gigaflops 57.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.0
OpenCL version 3.0 1.2
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 No
NPU theoretical performance 50 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR3
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 933 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s -
Max size 24 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 eMMC 5.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 1920 x 1200
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 7
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 7300 Mbps Up to 300 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 50 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 4
Bluetooth 6.0 4.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou

Info

Announced April 2025 January 2017
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number MT6991, MT6991Z/TCZA Hi6250
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus official site -
Successor - - HiSilicon Kirin 820

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
4 (66.7%)
2 (33.3%)
Total votes: 6

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 659 and Dimensity 9400 Plus, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of DeviceFacts community!